Review

Halo: The Master Chief Collection Review

  • First Released Nov 11, 2014
    released
  • XONE

That which is fleeting and that which endures.

For the better part of this new century, a game with "Halo" in the title has been one of the best places to romp around with friends, test your mettle against stiff challenges, and compete for glory on the online stage. Halo: The Master Chief Collection brings four of those games together in one package, and it does so with a crisp, organizational flair that makes it immediately inviting. Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary, Halo 2: Anniversary, Halo 3, and Halo 4 are laid out in such a way that no matter what mode you're angling for, it's easy to find your way to it, tweak the options just so, and set off down memory lane. Where that road may lead you, however, remains uncertain.

If you're undertaking one of the four campaigns, then you're in for a treat. Every mission is available right from the start, so you can head straight to the places you best remember, or start an adventure over from the beginning. It's like traveling through time or unearthing a time capsule, depending on your age, and it can take a little while to get your bearings as you calibrate to the particulars of each game. But once you're well acquainted, the thrills of yesteryear come rushing back. These are campaigns that stand the test of time well and invite replaying, whether it be on a harder difficulty level or just to mess around with vehicle physics on that one level you remember so well.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Halo: The Master Chief Collection Video Review

Outside the contained worlds of each game's campaign, however, The Master Chief Collection does not fare as well. Getting attuned to the many classic and anniversary varieties of competitive multiplayer can be disorienting initially, even if you have strong memories of each one. Once you have your bearings, the thrills of combat against your fellow player start to blossom, but getting that far is nearly impossible in the game's current state. Serious matchmaking issues often prevent you from even getting into a game, let alone the type of game you'd prefer. If you manage to get into a match, a host of other problems await, and upon completing a match, you're as likely to crash to the Xbox One dashboard as you are to be placed in another match. Fixes are on the way, according to developer 343 Industries, but as it stands now, The Master Chief Collection does not successfully deliver on its promises.

But what promises they are! To revisit the Halo 2 battlegrounds that brought so many people to Xbox Live? To relive the sprawling vehicular battles of Halo 3? To finally play classic Halo: Combat Evolved multiplayer online on a console? These are heady prospects for anyone who's been a fan of Halo over the years, though to actually experience them is something short of pure nostalgic glee. Loading into a multiplayer match can demand some abrupt memory recalibrations, as you pick up a bubble shield for the first time in over six years or try to dual wield a weapon and realize you cannot.

And the adjustments run deeper than that. From movement speed to weapon handling and balance, from audio cues to health systems, there are a host of things you need to compensate for when switching from game to game in a multiplayer session. It can be frustrating because one of the powerful draws of competition is the process of learning from your mistakes, adopting new tactics, and then meeting with newfound success. This progression is disrupted when hopping from game to game, but substantially smoother if you stick with one particular game for a while, say, a run of Team Slayer BR in the Halo 2: Anniversary playlist. Once you get that foothold, once you can remove the training wheels that you had to begrudgingly put back on, then you can begin to experience what made these games great.

Halo multiplayer has always had a few throughlines, regardless of the changes that helped evolve the series into what it is today. The balanced interplay of the limited array of weapons meant that you could develop strategies for every match-up and adjust your tactics accordingly. Head-on assault, stealth, misdirection, running for another gun, or hopping in a vehicle were all potential options, and they all coalesced to create dynamic battlefields that felt both immensely variable and fundamentally understandable. This sense of control and order amidst the chaos of online combat was crucial to the success of each of these games in its time, and it holds up firmly even now.

Good to see you too, Sarge.
Good to see you too, Sarge.

The multiplayer component of a game, however, is more tied to a moment in time than the campaign is due to its dependence on player population. A recently released game generally has more players regularly online representing a broader spectrum of skills, which leads to a more welcoming environment where people feel like they are finding fair matches. Years after a game's release, the population is whittled down significantly, and any newcomer is likely to feel the sting of the sharpened warriors who still remain. Furthermore, as time passes, players tend to gravitate towards a few preferred game modes, meaning that less popular options will end up essentially unplayable. How The Master Chief Collection will fare in this regard remains a big question, one that is all the more impactful given the sheer range of options that are potentially available. What is the fate of Halo 3 Oddball in a world that vastly prefers Team Slayer?

Though 343 Industries is attempting to manage this question by giving players a small, cultivated list of lobby choices, they are currently struggling to simply get players into games at all. Serious matchmaking issues have rendered online multiplayer extremely difficult to play in the three days since launch. At best, I was able to play three or four matches in one hour; at worst, I played zero. The matches I did play were often underpopulated or lopsided, and when they were over, there was little likelihood of being placed in a lobby for a subsequent match. 343 is posting frequently about server-side updates they are making to try to improve the situation, including one update that completely removed the option for Halo 4 matchmaking. How long will it be until you can reliably join a match within five minutes? When will the full roster of playlists be returned? Only time will tell, but until that time arrives, The Master Chief Collection is a huge disappointment for those who want to test their skills in online competition.

"Look, it's one of those hats that angels wear!"

If, however, the campaigns are your aim, then you're in luck. The four grand adventures of Master Chief, gathered here with the aforementioned organizational prowess, are still a treat to play through in a variety of ways. Setting off from the start or hopping from mission to mission; trying for a timed speed run or heaping on the skulls to make things tougher; ticking up the difficulty level for a solo or cooperative challenge; all are different ways to romp through these campaigns and each has its own appeal.

Take Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary. Released just three years ago, it was the first of Master Chief's jaunts to get the Anniversary treatment. Remastered visuals and audio were crafted to exist alongside the original assets, and you could switch between them with the press of a button. In The Master Chief Collection, seeing the flat-textured landscapes of the halo's surface spring to life with verdant foliage and sparkling rivers is a delight, and the increased color saturation makes your ugly Covenant foes seem all the more sinister. Though the remastered look is a great way to play, it's fun to switch between the two in different environments to see how drastic the difference is. And it's not always the more modern version that looks best, thanks to the alien elegance of the original Forerunner structures.

"Elegant" could be a charitable way to describe the even pace with which this first incarnation of Master Chief runs around these levels, or you could take a harsher view and call it "slow and plodding." Moving at the speed of 2001 can be initially off-putting, but of course, everything else in this world is designed around Chief moving the way he moves, and this internal consistency helps the adjustment process. As you learn to use the three prongs of Master Chief's arsenal--guns, grenades, and melee attacks--all over again, the balance between you and your enemies starts to become clear. Their individual and group tactics are at once formidable and deconstructible, encouraging you to both respect their power and figure out new ways to dismantle them in each new situation. This balance scales nicely as you add skulls, increase the difficulty, or team up with another player.

The foundations of Halo's gameplay were established in Combat Evolved, and Halo 2 elaborated on them with a lengthier campaign and a new playable protagonist. Though the story of when humanity first encountered a halo in CE is more highly regarded than Master Chief and the Arbiter's dual adventure in Halo 2, the sequel's campaign still delivers plenty of exciting moments that make it worth playing. The lesser (or perhaps just more convoluted) narrative benefits greatly from the addition of new cutscenes from Blur Studio, the animation house that contributed some excellent sequences to Halo 4. Blur's work here is a tremendous improvement, bringing new life not just to the characters and storyline, but to the world itself. Though they cover the same scenes and same dialogue (you can switch between to two on the fly to double check), they are crafted with a cinematic flair that the originals lacked. There's also some new content packed in for good measure, through in-game terminals and new cutscenes, that offer clues about the next release in the Halo series, Halo 5: Guardians.

The Anniversary treatment generally does right by Halo 2 as it does by CE, though there are a few caveats to be aware of. Lighting is a huge area of improvement, for the most part, bringing depth and contrast to levels to make them feel more vibrant. Still, there are times when the saturation goes a bit too far: under aerial bombardment from the Covenant, you may find your screen whited out to the point of blindness and deep in the twisting tunnels of a Forerunner structure, you might resort to swapping to the original visuals (again, with the push of a button) or upping the brightness on your TV to get your bearings.

As for the audio side of the remastering, a quick switch reveals just how much fuller and majestic the updated orchestration is. Crossing a suspension bridge in a tank and blasting Covenant vehicles out of the sky is a thrill either way, but it's amped up when you're blasting the robust new remastering of that excellent soundtrack. There are drawbacks, however, some of which will depend on your taste in weapon audio. The galloping clatter of the submachine gun has been replaced with a brasher, more metallic sound that I found more bland than the original, and while the original sniper rifle sounded like every shot rang out from a mountain top, the new one is a more perfunctory blast. Sounds like these made me wish for the option to pick and choose between remastered and original, but no such option exists.

No Caption Provided

Halo 3 is pointedly not an Anniversary edition, though both it and Halo 4 (and the two Anniversary editions) have been updated to run at 1080p resolution and 60 frames per second. You'll miss Blur's H2A handiwork when you watch Halo 3's cutscenes, but when it comes to playing the game, you're in for a treat. Halo 3's campaign really feels like the one in which Bungie nailed what it meant to be Halo. The through lines are still there from the beginning, including the balance of weapons, the enemy tactics, and the frequency and flexibility of vehicular combat. In Halo 3, the campaign flows deftly between diverse environments, giving you an array of ways to tackle a given situation.

The key here is replayability; this array of options isn't really necessary, or even fully exploitable, on one playthrough. Playing by yourself, with a friend, with some weird modifiers, or on a tougher difficulty level all provide different scenarios you have to figure out and all bring different options to the fore. A stiff challenge might make you experiment with creative new solutions, or a lighter one might urge you to try daring stunts where solid tactics would work just fine. In cultivating this flexibility, Halo 3 delights in your successes, punishes your failures, motivates you to be better, and inspires you to be creative, which are some of the best things a video game can do.

Halo 3 brought the first Halo trilogy to a close, and never is this more apparent than when playing Halo 4. The 2012 release signals a new start in a number of ways: Master Chief can now sprint for the first time and use the mobility-enhancing armor abilities introduced in Halo: Reach. For a man used to going one speed, it feels significantly different and more modern, a distinction that also becomes clear in multiplayer matches. Halo 4 introduces new enemies that challenge Master Chief with their maddening ability to shield each other, and also introduces new allies, who challenge Master Chief by not treating him like the unimpeachable hero warrior of the past. Seeing commanders talk brusquely and disrespectfully to the Chief is as much a signal of the new era as anything, and it's delivered with the best characterization, dialogue, and cinematography that the series has seen to date.

Drive it like you stole it, because you totally stole it.
Drive it like you stole it, because you totally stole it.

Though the action is peppier thanks to the new locomotion options, the core tenets of combat design that sustained the Halo series for so long are still in full effect. The new complement of weapons, abilities, and enemies carry the torch of diversity and flexibility proudly through the transition; Halo 4 was the first Halo developed entirely by 343 Industries and not Halo's creators, Bungie. It's also the best-looking game in the Collection, and though you can see its age relative to more recent releases, it's still a vivid, attractive game.

And it's a testament to the quality of Halo games throughout the years that Halo: The Master Chief Collection is an attractive package, despite the massive problems with online multiplayer. It's not a game that demands to be played, not in the way that a new game or a new entry in a beloved series might. Instead, it's a game that makes a strong case to be owned, to be put on your digital shelf for when you've got an old friend coming by, or are hankering to revisit familiar battlegrounds. And even if you don't have much experience with all the games contained herein, the way that they're all arranged in an immensely accessible way makes it easy to fire it up, play a few rounds or take on a few levels, and then put it down until the next time the mood strikes you. The Master Chief Collection is inviting, illuminating as it does the enduring appeal of the Halo series: to create worlds that are epic showpieces and elaborate playgrounds, places to triumph and places to play.

Halo: The Master Chief Collection is featured on our list of the best Xbox co-op games.

Back To Top

The Good

  • Core combat formula is engaging throughout every campaign
  • New Halo 2: Anniversary cutscenes are fantastic
  • Slick, intuitive menu organization

The Bad

  • Online multiplayer barely works

About the Author

A fan of Halo since its Macworld unveiling, Chris has played countless hours of Halo over the years. For this review, he played sizable chunks of each campaign using code provided by Microsoft. Once servers went live, he spent he better part of three days trying to get into online matches.
2962 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for waredati
waredati

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

i hope you'll change the score after update come out . if you dont , your score is worthless!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@waredati It's not worthless. Companies need to learn that releasing broken games is not done.

You really think they'll learn if every hyped up, broken game scores a 9 ?

3 • 
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By xhawk27

@R4gn4r0k @waredati Then you never should review MMOs or any other game that has Online gameplay.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By R4gn4r0k

@xhawk27 @R4gn4r0k @waredati Name me a recent hyped up MMO that was broken and unplayable like MCC multiplayer or AC: Unity.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@R4gn4r0k @xhawk27 @waredati MCC multiplayer is not totally unplayable. I can name KOTOR,

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bgrngod
Bgrngod

5766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

@xhawk27 Kotor was not broken and unplayable at launch...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bgrngod @xhawk27 It had issues though and MCC isn't 100% unplayable.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for sandman338
Sandman338

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

Didn't Gamespot give this game an 8 or 9 2 weeks ago? If they did and they can change the review score because of the online component then where is their 'revised' review for Driveclub?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Devil_78
Devil_78

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Devil_78

Four remastered games = 6/10 ! Gamespot is the biggest joke ever .

6 • 
Avatar image for Bgrngod
Bgrngod

5766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

@Devil_78 When half of each of those games is unplayable, yeah.. 6 is generous...

4 • 
Avatar image for Devil_78
Devil_78

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Devil_78

No ! All four games are playable . It's the multiplayer having problems. Also GTA 5 have unplayable mp but $amespot gave it 9 .

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sonypony4eva
SonyPony4eva

711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By SonyPony4eva

@Devil_78 about 8/10 people bought the MCC for multiplayer alone, no excuses.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for trillvillen1
TrillVilleN1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TrillVilleN1

Cool. This makes sense. The most broken multiplayer game released in recent history gets a 8 (Battlefield 4), but this game gets a 6 for a similar issue, which isn't anywhere near how bad Battlefield was? Yup. It makes perfect sense.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sunnnz
sunnnz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By sunnnz

@trillvillen1 GTA 5 got a 9/10 when that game was unplayable for almost 2 weeks. I sent an email to the reviewer to get a complete analysis of how the numerical score is assigned and i am also in touch with another senior member who said will look into this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Deadlysyns87
Deadlysyns87

502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@sunnnz GTA Online got its own review which they revised once it started working. GTA 5 and GTA online are two different games according to Rockstar.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for slaughterdj
slaughterdj

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By slaughterdj

Haha...who would of thought the biggest PS biased game review website would give MCC a 6? Why? Because the online multiplayer has server issues? The issues that always occur in online but always get fixed? What about GTA? Battlefield? These guys are seriously pathetic at their jobs.

4 • 
Avatar image for Devil_78
Devil_78

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

They didn't get paid

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dribblesbarbax
dribblesbarbax

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Saying hopping from one Halo multiplayer game to a different Halo multiplayer is jarring and bad is like saying drinking wine and then drinking whiskey is horrible. Dont mix your drinks. You'll ruin the experience.

5 • 
Avatar image for Gencic
Gencic

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@dribblesbarbax Mmmmm sexy...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for everson_rm
everson_rm

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By everson_rm

Acording to GS, Every Halo = Destiny.

2 • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@everson_rm No that's not what GS says.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Alecmrhand
Alecmrhand

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By Alecmrhand

Great and thorough review Chris Watters. You answered all my questions and more.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ycranger
ycranger

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By ycranger

Whenever people bitch about a game they preordered not being very good I laugh. That's what happens when you blindly give money without any knowledge of what the final product will be. However when websites release reviews that do not reflect the current state of the game I have a problem. People who wisely waited to get information on the game to inform their purchase are now being mislead. I don't think that websites even need to change the score, but at least put in a notification about issues that have turned up if they weren't part of the review version. Whether you agree with the new score or not I commend Gamespot for attempting to fully inform their readers.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@ycranger I don't think you understand the concept of a review. Reviews judge a game on its own merits, not on outside factors such as Xbox Live servers causing problems, so the "current state" of the game makes no sense. A game is reviewed on gameplay, story, graphics, sound, mechanics, etc. The issue with this game is only matchmaking right now.

3 • 
Avatar image for Bgrngod
Bgrngod

5766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

@greaseman1985 @ycranger Xbox Live is not an outside factor when it's the game's developers who are responsible for it being a complete disaster right now. There are plenty of other games running just fine on Xbox Live right now...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for CptMorgan21
CptMorgan21

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Tomb raider got a remaster for Xbox One, came out close to halo 4, and got similar scores. You could argue that the single player portions of tomb raider and MCC are both very good. Tomb raider had horrible multiplayer, but it had no affect on the score. Seems like there is a double standard for games that are expected to have good multiplayer. Scores should be separate for both parts of the game.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blikketty
blikketty

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@CptMorgan21 Of course, you could also argue that pretty much no one bought the Tomb Raider remaster for the purpose of playing multiplayer, whereas the great majority of people who bought this Halo collection won't even touch anything but multiplayer except for the purpose of seeing some of the upgraded cutscenes.......

Upvote • 
Avatar image for CptMorgan21
CptMorgan21

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@blikketty @CptMorgan21 that's exactly why we need separate review scores for multiplayer and Single-Player. Just because halo has had better multiplayer than most games in the past should not mean they get punished more when they have issues. That's the double standard. games like tomb raider, bioshock 2, far cry 2, and the darkness are just a few of the good games with horrible multiplayer, and if they had released with matchmaking issues no reviewer or player would have cared.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for oflow
oflow

5185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

I can understand people being frustrated with the matchmaking but I dont really think that should have lowered the score down below average. The game has a collection of remastered single player campaigns from four games that all got 9s, even losing two points for crappy multiplayer issues, that should still leave the game at a 7.

I havent really jumped into MP yet, I wanted to replay the story and watch the remastered cutscenes etc. Halo has a pretty outstanding story, dudebro jokes and the Sony fans that never played it making a bunch of shooter jokes aside. The thing that MCC did for me was made me remember how much better stories in video games used to be, even the on rail games had decent stories with a lot less handholding.

The other thing that this game does is offers couch co-op which is really the selling point of the game that everyone seems to forget when you talk about this game. This is a game collection you play to enjoy a great story with a friend, not some whiner on the internet. That alone makes it a a great game.

2 • 
Avatar image for Supabul
Supabul

4266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

The 4 halo games are all rated 9 and above on this site, but together all on one disc they get a 6


So are the Halo games overrated as individual titles

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Gamespot delayed this review for quite some time. They waited and waited but 343 had not yet fixed the online.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@Bread_or_Decide Did you read the review or just look at the score?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@greaseman1985 @Bread_or_Decide I read the review.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for emptycow718
emptycow718

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By emptycow718

this site has trash reviews all the time they give halo mcc a 6.0 but give the very broken and unplayable Assassin's Creed unity a 7.0 they also gave they super over rated bf4 a 8.0 you know the same game that has the worst AI in the world a trash story and online that is still broken today.. this site is pure crap

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jissu_ae
Jissu_AE

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@emptycow718 Unity deserved that 7.0 though...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sexyragu
SexyRagu

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By SexyRagu

@emptycow718 It's not that simple. The GameSpot staff do not all contribute to a review. A review is written by a single member, so of course some reviews will contradict each other in terms of opinions and criticisms. Chriss Watters gave this game a 6, whereas Mark Walton gave AC Unity a 7.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for emptycow718
emptycow718

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@sexyragu i know but the scores are misleading that thats why i say this site is crap ..if people want real reviews go to giantbomb.com gamespot.com is done

Upvote • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@sexyragu What he's saying is there should be a standard for reviewing games, no matter who the reviewer is. While I generally read the review and I happen to agree for the most part, I don't give much importance to the number rating but for the most part the number rating tends to be consistent with the review. In this case however, it isn't. If you read the full review it would suggest a number rating of 8 or better, yet it gets a 6 and it throws you off. It seems like while Chris is generally praising the game in the review, his rating of the game is heavily dependent on one bug.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

I've said before I don't give a crap about the number a game gets, but in this case it doesn't seem to match the actual review. is the low score only because of the problematic matchmaking? Its unfair to give such a weight to that one issue when everything else about the game is nearly perfect. Besides, once the matchmaking is fixed (slated for Wednesday) will you be updating the score?

The user rating is more accurate than your rating, and like I said your rating really doesn't match your review. Just look at your conclusion of good vs bad, the only thing you have in bad is matchmaking.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bgrngod
Bgrngod

5766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

@greaseman1985


Man, if I had a nickel for every "I don't give a crap about the number a game gets, but in this case it doesn't seem to match the actual review" I've seen over the years, I'd be retired already.


Apparently you DO give a crap.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nichous77
nichous77

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By nichous77

If you only bought this for MP, 6/10 seems like a pretty charitable score based on my experience. It's only one negative point against a game with many positives, but for me and many others, it's a total deal breaker for Halo to have broken online MP.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Edited By greaseman1985

@nichous77 It doesn't matter what you bought it for. For me I don't give a damn about the multiplayer right now, so should I give the game 10/10? No of course not, the game should be reviewed as a whole. My point here is not the score it got, it is the fact it doesn't match the review. Really the only gripe this guy has about the game is the matchmaking issues, not even saying multiplayer is bad or uneven or something, but matchmaking issues that will get fixed soon. Everything else about the game he praises.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rjh_24
RJH_24

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By RJH_24

@greaseman1985 thats a nice little rant for someone that "don't give a crap about the number a game gets" LOL

3 • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Edited By greaseman1985

@rjh_24 @greaseman1985 Its not a rant, dumb sh*t. Nice to see you again, though. No work today? What happened, fired from McDonald's?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rjh_24
RJH_24

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By RJH_24

@greaseman1985 nope no one wants a big mac today so i figured i come make fun of the no lifes

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Lu_Shen
Lu_Shen

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Would have been so great if this was on PC... Too bad I don't play FPS games on consoles.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for talesinho
talesinho

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Fair Review

4 • 
Avatar image for talesinho
talesinho

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Fair Review.

4 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

One of the negatives in the review that isn't listed at the bottom is how jarring it is to go from one multiplayer into the next.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for loafofgame
loafofgame

1742

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide I think the reviewer says 'can be', instead of 'is'.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-57aa19ab947c7
deactivated-57aa19ab947c7

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Bread_or_Decide

Probably because it is completely avoidable and on one's own choice to go from one multiplayer to the next. There are playlists that have you sticking to one type. It's just part of the review advising players that it's best to not jump from one to the other quickly if they want a good experience.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for btroof
btroof

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By btroof

i know GS not shy about there scores but damn a 6 for Halo tho... ouch

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@btroof Twilight Princess all over again.

Upvote •