People are getting all upset about no campaign, and I didn't like the idea at first but think about it, is it really that much of a shocker? The campaigns seem to get worse each game because of how little effort they put in due to the multiplayer being what really made the game popular. Out of all the people who buy CoD games what do you think the majority gets it for? I've had people over 6 or 7 years ago back in high school tell me that they only buy the games for multiplayer and don't even bother with the campaign, so what do you expect? Or do you like paying $60 or more ($80 - $90 here in Aus) for an < 10 hour campaign that isn't even good? Then you end up spending potentially hundreds more hours on the multiplayer anyway. I really would love another campaign as good as World at Wars, but you know that's not going to happen, so I'd rather them spend the money, time and effort on multiplayer and zombies instead.
They made it way too easy and obvious, it's as if they just threw it in because they felt they needed to, anyone who knows about the secret ending in 4 will instantly realise not cuffing him is the way to unlock it. It was done much better in 4.
Damn this looks so much nicer and easier on the eyes than the other maps, they should have done something like this from the start, smaller map will definitely help speed up the gameplay a bit and make it less boring as well.
thebigwig1894's comments