firefluff3's forum posts
It's not a demo at all. Lets say Battlefield 1943 was a game they've had in development for quite a while, and want to see what the feedback was on it. It's more like a test to see if the game will sell. Maybe it could be used to test game engines, release smaller versions of games that were cancelled halfway through development.
Hi, on the back of my battlefield: bad company 2 box, it says i have a VIP code. i have no idea where i find it inside the box, could anyone help? Thanks :)
They shouldn't have released a demo - The game is about destruction fun and over the top action. Sure, it was good but it didn't show us how the game was meant to be played. Look at the anatomy of a stunt trailers, they're pretty awesome :)
When you're whole squad is a sniper
The fact that medics don't have medi-kits straight away
That in sqaud deathmatch half you're team/enemy team quits halfway through the game
Medics that don't help the team
Getting stuck between rocks and having to kill yourself to get out
Maps being repeated in squad deathmatch (i know why they repeat in rush, but why deathmatch?!)
when people wonder off and don't work as a team
I expected metro 2033 to get at least an 8, will most likely be a sleeper hit. It hardly had any advertising and it looked like one of them games that would be delayed for 3 years. On IGN it got critisized for being too short (8-10 hours, i think it was IGN) and yet other short games get amazing reviews because they have been hyped to hell.
Actually I'm for the decimal system: I believe that if a game scored a 9.0 and its sequel is slightly better, a 9.1 is the right way to express that.Black_Knight_00
COD4 was great. MW2 should have got a 8 max, the worst map design EVER!
Log in to comment