as far as 3ds vs vita, i think its going to come down to the games. of course the vita looks better, the 3ds has the whole 3d thing going and is cheaper while the vita is a bit pricy.but if one or the other has a big advantage game wise then thats the system more people are going to go with.
CyberLips, every year lol. the wii,ps3 and 360 are 5+ years old. that old for a game console. 4 to 6 years is the avg for a successfull system. by that point the next system is released while the last system may keep going with reduced softwear support. thats the way it has been sense what the snes.
syler4815162342, Ai improvment as far as hardwear goes is tied to the processing power of the system. how ever any REAL improvment will come from the software side of things. the hardwear only makes better AI posable.
i cant wait to play this game. salvator is one of my fav wrighters and his characters such as drizzt,entreri and jarlaxel are among my fav of all time right up there with superman,batman and spiderman ect. And he can def creat detailed worlds there is no doubt. hopefully the game will live up to the hype. if this game turns out as good as skyrim minus the dang bugs then id be one happy gamer.
going by the screen shots i think GS is dead wrong on a few of those game. But even still the very best looking games are ps3 exclussives. uncharted 2,mgs4 and killzone 2 all look better than any thing on the 360. of course that does not count.
YEP dj_c4 is right. not only contrast but othersettings to. look at deadspace and how the tent is off on the ps3.. there faces all look red lol. thats what alot of sites dont think to do. each console ect out puts deff. on my TV i have deff settings for my Wii,ps3 and dvd player as thay all out put deff ratio's as far as color,brightness and tent.
boer28 how about add in MOBO, case,power supply,HDD,DVD drive, and were in the world do you find a a 22inch monitor,keybord and mouse AND speakers for 250$ or do you buy super cheapo stuff. and as far as the monitior you can use that same monitor on a ps3. or you can buy a 20 or so inch HDtv for roughly the same price. also dont forget you dont have to buy the 500$ ps3 thay make a 400$ that plays games just as well ;)
wow, how about thay compair them from 2 years ago to PC, funny how now thay do a compairison lol. . of course pc is going to look a little better now. even still games like killzone 2 and mgs4 are not that far behind what crysis looks like on a 1500$ rig 2000$ when the game first came out. And BS to the guys who like to say that PC gaming is not that pricey. So nighttrain you say PC gameing is not that much more pricey and to back that up you say you have spent 350$ JUST on upgardes lol. so paying nearly the cost of an entire ps3 or 360 JUST on upgrades is not "that" much more expensive? and how much was that PCto start with minus the 350$ upgrades? man thats like saying no my car is not alot more expensive it just cost alot more :p i know better, i have built my own PC's for the last 7 years, unless you get your parts used or from no name web site of wich you take risk a GOOD not GREAT or AVERGE will run you ball park 1000$ to 1200$. you can build a cheapo throw away rig for 5 to 600 but it will not even come close to lasting the 5 years a console will. you ALWAYS end up paying weather its for a 500$ pc that might be lucky to last a year playing new games at med/high settings or paying 2k$ for a higher end rig that could last 3 to 4 years. eather way you get what you pay for. mobo 100$,cpu150$,gpu 200$,psu 100$,ram 150$,HDD 100$,dvd drive 50$,case 100$, not even going to count fans cables ect or if you need speakers,key board or monitor. and that would be ball park for just a med run of the mill rig. most gaming PC's can run ALOT more per part than what i just used as a base line. And dont get me started on those 500$ gpu's or multi GPU rigs. even then you need a pricey PSU to run the gpu. it adds up FAST. Not to even bring up repairing one. PC gaming is GREAT but tryn to argue that its not much more pricey than console gaming is beyond stretching the truth lol. of course now and then you can find a great deal or hit it just right but then again you can realy screw your self up. dont get wrong im not saing console gameing is perfect or even that i think consoles are "better". but bang for the buck i think thay are the better choice for many. in fact im hopeing to build me a new gameing rig soon. i just LOL when people try to cover up facts to make there systems of choice's weak points.
hmmm i wounder why the ps3 is blurry in these test? i can def tell the RGB is on simple. and that the displays were NOT ajusted for each console. Creed was apariant to any PS3 gamer who has played it on there own TV. i think one problem is that the out put on the two systems are very deffernt. GS try cutting down the bightness and uping the contrast a lttle.And yes i would like to see GOW2/3 vs killzone2 or MGS4. that would be something to compaire. iirc i read that most multi ports up till now have been started on the 360 first and that the PS3 is VERY deffernt to program for so that may be the problem. as far as the fellow who stated that the PS3 fails do to it haveing a year more dev time. well that goes both ways, 3rd party devs have had a full year to LEARN how to work with the 360. lets compair first year 360 games to first year PS3 games hmmmm ;)
Wild_Card's comments