@chipwithdip @DinoFarmBlake I have to agree with DinoFarm. They have gotten progressively worse with 64 being the best and Melee still being very good. Brawl was mediocre at best. Slow, clunky, and relatively absent of skill. It's a party game which is why it has limited lasting appeal. I would say Melee did the best of appealing to all crowds. A game should be easily to learn and pick up but difficult to master, somethiing that 64 and Melee both did very well.

Great, now Microsoft will know how much I drink (a lot) and how much I get laid (a little) and use it against me. My XBox home screen is going to be a whirlwind of depression.

@Dredcrumb9 Not true, enemies in Bioshock had health bars too.

I disagree Flaming Fury. Sort of. Magicka, for example, was terribly bug ridden when it was released but is now a very enjoyable game. I know people do not really have time to review games twice, which is understandable. I don't really have a problem with how things are now. But it would be nice, as people have said, if we were updated on how a game has progressed after we chose not to buy it initially (due to bugs, not the actual quality of fun of the game). I do, however, understand it should be bug proofed 1st and that if they did multiple reviews it would almost encourage companies to rush their product.