I laugh at people owning an XB1 to play games on. It's truly a piss poor gaming experience.

@l3u12tgmm312x: Its the same thing.. Are you really that dumb? All computers are PC's

@Zzshock: 1280x720= 921,600 pixels

1920x1080= 2,073,600 pixels

Difference of 1,152,000 pixels

3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels

Difference of 6,220,800 pixels over 1080P

If you say that 720P to 1080P looks like a bigger difference than 1080p to 4k then you must be high.

@tyranttortuga: Once when consoles have 4k, a PC will have at least 8k.

@hansbeej: PC can do 4k though

So the person who wrote this article thinks the CPU deals with graphics? I have news for you that it does not and unlocking another cores doesn't mean that much. It might maybe be a increase of 15% in performance which might net into an average of a 5fps gain in everything. The CPU to begin with is crap and it needs more speed and not more cores. So people thinking this is some spetacular thing is dead wrong.

@robbansj: You're just jealous.

@Triton: The reason why they all look good or very similar to each other (especially for PC) is because the graphics honestly suck on the game. Even at 4k it still isn't that impressive

@Blue-Sky: Are you using 2 980TI's or something? Considering how poorly optimized this game is that is quite impressive.

@Zero_Maniac: 4k is very practical if you can handle it. 1080P is 2.7m pixles and 4k is like 8.7m pixels. The difference is massive and makes a noticeable difference. Not to mention having a 4k monitor is VERY nice for just windows itself.