@joecollin: multiplayer on PS3 was one hundred percent FREE, genius. You seriously don't have a clue about reality. No wonder you blindly accept what is essentially a type of surcharge to fucking unlock a basic functionality. Well, certainly you and everyone else who blindly supported that surcharge known as Xbox Live and screwed everyone, including yourselves. Thanks for that.

But, no. Your timeline of the multiplayer surcharge is completely off. You are also ignoring that the subscription must be maintained to keep access to any and all games you may have gotten through the service, for whatever laughable reason. They're directly tied to the ongoing cost. They don't cost a dollar or whatever you want to purely make up to defend what is a gouging practice. If it was an optional service, LIKE IT WAS ON PS3, it would be fair. Oh, and if 99 percent of the games weren't awful. Like in the PS3 days as well. 😄

@joecollin: free isn't the correct word to use. Stop believing in falsehoods.

@stickemup: LMAO. Keep defending a horrendous service just because you are easily entertained.

Surprisingly not terrible. Except Payday 3, of course.

@j3diknightdave: hah. Sure. Why don't you look at what a Dr Mario goes for. That's just one surprising example of how valuable they actually are.

Overplayed song makes me revile overplayed song.

There's no possibility of them not losing money on this.

Wow. 50 games in 5 years. He said sarcastically.

@gameboy8877: pfffft, yeah right. As if your average gamer is remotely good at any remotely challenging FPS. Or knows what actual quality FPS fundamentals are, for that matter. Both games are two of the finest in the genre, and you don't have a genuinely logical argument against that.

Clearly this is one of the finest games of the year, whether one wants to admit it or not.