Halo reach vs. Call of Duty Black Ops

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#51 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="xxmarksm3nxx"]why do people want games to be like real life? i play games to take a break from life not to re-live it as a different person.DranzarTypeF

As you can see I have Mass Effect in my sig, which means I could care less about "realism" in games, but COD is supposed to capture the feel of a battleground and simulate to the best of its abilities and its famous for that

Which Modern Warfare 2 really threw out the window.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#52 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="MadVybz"]

Speculation has been going around that it's set in Vietnam. It's not being said by only a few people either...Everyone I see talking about it keeps saying the same thing.

But judging from WaW, it's more than likely just going to be another straight rip with a different skin.

DarkGamer007

Are you serious ? lol...I'm taking Halo Reach.

Epsecially if Teryarch gives us the "America **** YEAH" version of Nam. :|

I really don't see how anyone could do that with a game set in the Vietnam war.
Avatar image for freelancer_ohio
freelancer_ohio

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 freelancer_ohio
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Bungie said reach was going to be different from the original halo trilogy in terms of gameplay,well atleast,thats what i heard.either way im sure both games will be great but i'll probably be more interested in buying halo reach
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#54 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="In-Flamez"]

[QUOTE="xxmarksm3nxx"]naw im not a fan boy im just tired of people bashing the game that made the FPS i like cod mw2 alot but i like halo alot too.xxmarksm3nxx

Nobody is bashing Wolfenstein 3D here.

wolfenstein 3d wasnt very good IMO.

lol considering it was the first FPS, yeh, its pretty good
Avatar image for Bl3ss_The_F4ll
Bl3ss_The_F4ll

190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Bl3ss_The_F4ll
Member since 2009 • 190 Posts

I've never liked Halo and never will. I'm going for Call of Duty 7

Avatar image for sivasiva
sivasiva

1101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#56 sivasiva
Member since 2007 • 1101 Posts

Dude, how would you expect us to know which is better? There is no proper gameplay videos of Halo-Reach yet and there is no videos or previews of Call of Duty 7.

Avatar image for AnubisNohman
AnubisNohman

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 AnubisNohman
Member since 2006 • 88 Posts

It is really hard to say which you should choose. Both really are games that havent had a major variation of gameplay through the titles except in story andmultiplayer. whichever route you choose I would say is gonna make for some pretty awesome game play. Honestly though I would have to say that I am going to go with Call of Duty just out of personal preference.

Happy gaming!

Avatar image for AnubisNohman
AnubisNohman

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 AnubisNohman
Member since 2006 • 88 Posts

lol considering it was the first FPS, yeh, its pretty goodchaoscougar1
Wolfenstein was one of the first FPS games. Spasim and Maze War came out in the 70's if my memory serves me correctly. Wolfenstein came out 92'. Wolfenstein 3d was still awesome though, and whoever said that it wasn't deserves broken knees!

Avatar image for clh_05
clh_05

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 clh_05
Member since 2005 • 442 Posts
This is all very simple. This so called COD7 (I don't know what happened to COD5, and COD6) is made by Treyarch, which means it's going to be terrible. So of course Halo: Reach will be better.
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="xxmarksm3nxx"]why do people want games to be like real life? i play games to take a break from life not to re-live it as a different person.vashkey

As you can see I have Mass Effect in my sig, which means I could care less about "realism" in games, but COD is supposed to capture the feel of a battleground and simulate to the best of its abilities and its famous for that

Which Modern Warfare 2 really threw out the window.

Not really they just tried to make the missions vary a bit, some missions depicted a war ground and some were based off of Michael Bay's 24 series which is more linked to profiling criminals and terrorist etc., still felt very authentic for COD : MW .

Also GameSport must have the only forums in the world were you can QUADRUPLE post lol.;)

Avatar image for sharkbiscuit79
sharkbiscuit79

1142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 sharkbiscuit79
Member since 2009 • 1142 Posts
[QUOTE="xxmarksm3nxx"]naw im not a fan boy im just tired of people bashing the game that made the FPS i like cod mw2 alot but i like halo alot too.chaoscougar1
that made the FPS? thats a big call and untrue; half-life, quake, unreal tournament, counter strike, wolfenstein; now those games made the FPS genre back in the day

if you want to get picky i think DOOM might be the one that set it all off
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#63 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="xxmarksm3nxx"]naw im not a fan boy im just tired of people bashing the game that made the FPS i like cod mw2 alot but i like halo alot too.sharkbiscuit79
that made the FPS? thats a big call and untrue; half-life, quake, unreal tournament, counter strike, wolfenstein; now those games made the FPS genre back in the day

if you want to get picky i think DOOM might be the one that set it all off

oops, i knew i would forget a couple, probs should modify the original list to include doom, goldeneye and perfect dark :P
Avatar image for Jonas008
Jonas008

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Jonas008
Member since 2006 • 428 Posts

Halo Reach if you dont know is made by bungie, and centers around noble team. A team of spartans and their noble attempt to defend reach.

Call of duty 7 is made by treyarch and is rumored to take place in the cold war. Expect to see some WAW gameplay and not MW2. Mabey even some Commie zombies.

both games are scheduled for release fall 2010. Which one do you think will be better. I personaly am going with halo reach. I am getting tired of the same old CODfish every year and have never grown bored of the occasional team slayer

natanaj
if it isn't modern warfare = fail
Avatar image for MGamer333
MGamer333

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 MGamer333
Member since 2008 • 519 Posts

People there isn't even a COD 6 and im not even sure WAW was the 5th one. MW2 was still COD 4 but is the second MW so we dont even know if there even going to be a COD 7

Avatar image for natanaj
natanaj

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 natanaj
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

People there isn't even a COD 6 and im not even sure WAW was the 5th one. MW2 was still COD 4 but is the second MW so we dont even know if there even going to be a COD 7

MGamer333

WAW was call of duty 5. MW2 was call of duty 6.

Personally, the only thing I enjoy about CODfish is Nazi Zombies, and specops

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="MGamer333"]

People there isn't even a COD 6 and im not even sure WAW was the 5th one. MW2 was still COD 4 but is the second MW so we dont even know if there even going to be a COD 7

natanaj

WAW was call of duty 5. MW2 was call of duty 6.

Personally, the only thing I enjoy about CODfish is Nazi Zombies, and specops

Same here lol... I like the campaigns as well, me and my friends just like challenging aspect of the games, the MP is ? meh once you've played 100 games it becomes second nature to you, I'm bored of the MP and the glitched lobbies make it worse.

Avatar image for RipaX21
RipaX21

1675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#68 RipaX21
Member since 2005 • 1675 Posts

People there isn't even a COD 6 and im not even sure WAW was the 5th one. MW2 was still COD 4 but is the second MW so we dont even know if there even going to be a COD 7

MGamer333

They're probably going to drop the numbers all together and Just make it Call of Duty: subtitle from now on.

Avatar image for natanaj
natanaj

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 natanaj
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts
[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="natanaj"]

[QUOTE="MGamer333"]

People there isn't even a COD 6 and im not even sure WAW was the 5th one. MW2 was still COD 4 but is the second MW so we dont even know if there even going to be a COD 7

WAW was call of duty 5. MW2 was call of duty 6.

Personally, the only thing I enjoy about CODfish is Nazi Zombies, and specops

Same here lol... I like the campaigns as well, me and my friends just like challenging aspect of the games, the MP is ? meh once you've played 100 games it becomes second nature to you, I'm bored of the MP and the glitched lobbies make it worse.

yeah. I like halo multiplayer better. Because in halo, the players all work strategies and work together and the battles are more fun and different every time. In cod, all you do is run around and look for people. If you see someone, you shoot at him and whoevermoves their crosshairs over the other persons head and starts fireing first wins. BORING
Avatar image for MGamer333
MGamer333

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 MGamer333
Member since 2008 • 519 Posts
[QUOTE="natanaj"]

[QUOTE="MGamer333"]

People there isn't even a COD 6 and im not even sure WAW was the 5th one. MW2 was still COD 4 but is the second MW so we dont even know if there even going to be a COD 7

WAW was call of duty 5. MW2 was call of duty 6.

Personally, the only thing I enjoy about CODfish is Nazi Zombies, and specops

where do you see COD6 on the MW2 box and IW never did mention it being COD6
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="natanaj"]

[QUOTE="MGamer333"]

People there isn't even a COD 6 and im not even sure WAW was the 5th one. MW2 was still COD 4 but is the second MW so we dont even know if there even going to be a COD 7

MGamer333

WAW was call of duty 5. MW2 was call of duty 6.

Personally, the only thing I enjoy about CODfish is Nazi Zombies, and specops

where do you see COD6 on the MW2 box and IW never did mention it being COD6

Thats because they want to drop the "Call Of Duty" label and just call it "Modern Warfare" but Activision refuses to publish a game without COD on the cover. In theory it is call of duty 6 because it's the "6th" installment...common sense ?

Avatar image for MGamer333
MGamer333

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 MGamer333
Member since 2008 • 519 Posts
[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="MGamer333"][QUOTE="natanaj"]

WAW was call of duty 5. MW2 was call of duty 6.

Personally, the only thing I enjoy about CODfish is Nazi Zombies, and specops

where do you see COD6 on the MW2 box and IW never did mention it being COD6

Thats because they want to drop the "Call Of Duty" label and just call it "Modern Warfare" but Activision refuses to publish a game without COD on the cover. In theory it is call of duty 6 because it's the "6th" installment...common sense ?

But is still the second MW of COD 4 so i think it is still Cod 4 and im pretty sure they drop the "Call of Duty" because is not the real COD6 and people can realize is still COD4
Avatar image for natanaj
natanaj

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 natanaj
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="MGamer333"] where do you see COD6 on the MW2 box and IW never did mention it being COD6MGamer333

Thats because they want to drop the "Call Of Duty" label and just call it "Modern Warfare" but Activision refuses to publish a game without COD on the cover. In theory it is call of duty 6 because it's the "6th" installment...common sense ?

But is still the second MW of COD 4 so i think it is still Cod 4 and im pretty sure they drop the "Call of Duty" because is not the real COD6 and people can realize is still COD4

actually, before they announced the name, Activition and infinity ward refered to the game as COD6. Just like Treyark and activision are calling this COD7. And it is not still COD 4. It is an indivigual game that takes place after COD 4. Saying it is COD 4 is like saying that halo 2 is realy halo 1. And if you still don't believe it is COD 7, please type down Call of duty 7 on the search bar

Avatar image for MGamer333
MGamer333

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 MGamer333
Member since 2008 • 519 Posts
[QUOTE="natanaj"]

[QUOTE="MGamer333"][QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]Thats because they want to drop the "Call Of Duty" label and just call it "Modern Warfare" but Activision refuses to publish a game without COD on the cover. In theory it is call of duty 6 because it's the "6th" installment...common sense ?

But is still the second MW of COD 4 so i think it is still Cod 4 and im pretty sure they drop the "Call of Duty" because is not the real COD6 and people can realize is still COD4

actually, before they announced the name, Activition and infinity ward refered to the game as COD6. Just like Treyark and activision are calling this COD7. And it is not still COD 4. It is an indivigual game that takes place after COD 4. Saying it is COD 4 is like saying that halo 2 is realy halo 1. And if you still don't believe it is COD 7, please type down Call of duty 7 on the search bar

no a better one would be saying halo 3 odst is halo 3 which i kinda is and even if i typ in cod 7 they will show me WAW2 because people think that
Avatar image for natanaj
natanaj

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 natanaj
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

halo3 odst is an expansion on halo 3

Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts

[QUOTE="xxmarksm3nxx"]why do people want games to be like real life? i play games to take a break from life not to re-live it as a different person.DranzarTypeF

As you can see I have Mass Effect in my sig, which means I could care less about "realism" in games, but COD is supposed to capture the feel of a battleground and simulate to the best of its abilities and its famous for that, but I know how to separate a realistic shooter from a high-fantasy shooter, so I still like Halo, I just don't want COD to be like Halo lol.

So akimbo is normal in modern warfare? I have never seen a soldier duel-wielding a weapon and I love history.. How can anyone call Modern Warfare realistic? Battlefield does a much better job simulating the feel of a battleground and that's something COD will never accomplish or at least they certainly aren't going into the right direction. I played through the singleplayer and it was awesome but it felt like an action movie rather than a war.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#77 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="MGamer333"][QUOTE="natanaj"]

WAW was call of duty 5. MW2 was call of duty 6.

Personally, the only thing I enjoy about CODfish is Nazi Zombies, and specops

DranzarTypeF

where do you see COD6 on the MW2 box and IW never did mention it being COD6

Thats because they want to drop the "Call Of Duty" label and just call it "Modern Warfare" but Activision refuses to publish a game without COD on the cover. In theory it is call of duty 6 because it's the "6th" installment...common sense ?

Technically is far and away from being the sixth installment. More like the twelfth.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#78 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"]

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]As you can see I have Mass Effect in my sig, which means I could care less about "realism" in games, but COD is supposed to capture the feel of a battleground and simulate to the best of its abilities and its famous for thatDranzarTypeF

Which Modern Warfare 2 really threw out the window.

Not really they just tried to make the missions vary a bit, some missions depicted a war ground and some were based off of Michael Bay's 24 series which is more linked to profiling criminals and terrorist etc., still felt very authentic for COD : MW .

Also GameSport must have the only forums in the world were you can QUADRUPLE post lol.;)

So long as you ignore the Micheal Bay explosions, dual wielding, the whole Shepard surviving a helicopter crash, the ability to shoot ridiculously accurate while also driving a snow mobile or raft(bullet practically feel like enemy magnets)... The game is more akin to a big action movie. It's not really believable. And it's far and away from a realistic combat simulator. Even before Modern Warfare 2 CoD wasn't a realistic combat simulator. But Modern Warfare really took out the believable situations.

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="xxmarksm3nxx"]why do people want games to be like real life? i play games to take a break from life not to re-live it as a different person.craigalan23

As you can see I have Mass Effect in my sig, which means I could care less about "realism" in games, but COD is supposed to capture the feel of a battleground and simulate to the best of its abilities and its famous for that, but I know how to separate a realistic shooter from a high-fantasy shooter, so I still like Halo, I just don't want COD to be like Halo lol.

So akimbo is normal in modern warfare? I have never seen a soldier duel-wielding a weapon and I love history.. How can anyone call Modern Warfare realistic? Battlefield does a much better job simulating the feel of a battleground and that's something COD will never accomplish or at least they certainly aren't going into the right direction. I played through the singleplayer and it was awesome but it felt like an action movie rather than a war.

We have a misunderstanding lol, they way the game plays is not realistic at all (you need stopping power just to kill a person normally), I'm talking about the presentation. I agree with you guys that the gameplay has never been realistic.

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="vashkey"]Which Modern Warfare 2 really threw out the window.

vashkey

Not really they just tried to make the missions vary a bit, some missions depicted a war ground and some were based off of Michael Bay's 24 series which is more linked to profiling criminals and terrorist etc., still felt very authentic for COD : MW .

Also GameSport must have the only forums in the world were you can QUADRUPLE post lol.;)

So long as you ignore the Micheal Bay explosions, dual wielding, the whole Shepard surviving a helicopter crash, the ability to shoot ridiculously accurate while also driving a snow mobile or raft(bullet practically feel like enemy magnets)... The game is more akin to a big action movie. It's not really believable. And it's far and away from a realistic combat simulator. Even before Modern Warfare 2 CoD wasn't a realistic combat simulator. But Modern Warfare really took out the believable situations.

You are right, I worded it wrong. What I mean by realistic is the way the characters, guns, vehicles etc. look. The presentation is realistic comparing it to a game like maybe Halo which is more of a high-fantasy shooter with the aliens, super powered soldiers etc.

Avatar image for natanaj
natanaj

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 natanaj
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="MGamer333"] where do you see COD6 on the MW2 box and IW never did mention it being COD6vashkey

Thats because they want to drop the "Call Of Duty" label and just call it "Modern Warfare" but Activision refuses to publish a game without COD on the cover. In theory it is call of duty 6 because it's the "6th" installment...common sense ?

Technically is far and away from being the sixth installment. More like the twelfth.

how is it the twelth

Avatar image for ismo2009
ismo2009

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 ismo2009
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts

both of them will suck (imo and i hope so...) withouth master chief isnt halo, and cod died a long time ago. I am actually not proud that i bought cod mw2, it was one of the biggest rip off. Some people will like it but if you play the hole cod series you know what i mean. Halo all the way and btw mw2 was one of the worst mp games ever!

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

both of them will suck (imo and i hope so...) withouth master chief isnt halo, and cod died a long time ago. I am actually not proud that i bought cod mw2, it was one of the biggest rip off. Some people will like it but if you play the hole cod series you know what i mean. Halo all the way and btw mw2 was one of the worst mp games ever!

ismo2009

You're not making much sense lol...I can't stand fanboys like you, people like you are whats wrong with the gaming community. Why can't people learn to critique games without being biased ?:P

Avatar image for Suicide-Panda
Suicide-Panda

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#84 Suicide-Panda
Member since 2009 • 583 Posts

Ill be going with Treyarch, Modern warfare 2 was well over hyped. But i'll still be getting Halo: Reach anyway =D

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#85 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
If I had to guess -which I do- I'll choose Halo: Reach. I'm expecting some truly epic **** to go down in that game. COD games are fun but the set pieces, story, settings and universe don't compare to the Halo games. Plus Halo's online has more modes, larger maps, vehicles, etc which puts it above COD online- I'm sure Reach will keep all these things. Bungie's track record dwarves Treyarch's too.
Avatar image for TehRoyalManiac
TehRoyalManiac

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 TehRoyalManiac
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
If its WWII again I am gonna go of my **** nut! Really getting pissed off with Call of Duty being in WWII, 6 Cods, 2 in Modern Warfare!
Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#87 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts

im def not buying the next cod game if it comes out in 2010 im tired of this every year crap they are gonna run the series into the ground ill just stick with MW2 until the next real cod with actual improvements comes out.

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

im def not buying the next cod game if it comes out in 2010 im tired of this every year crap they are gonna run the series into the ground ill just stick with MW2 until the next real cod with actual improvements comes out.

Gen007

This. I usually buy IW's version, then skip Treyarch's year, because feel like Activision is over-capitolizing on the games success. Also if they can patch MW2 well, I see this being the best one yet.

Avatar image for natanaj
natanaj

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 natanaj
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

MW2 SUCKS!!!

Avatar image for MasterSpaceman
MasterSpaceman

260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 MasterSpaceman
Member since 2009 • 260 Posts

Halo: Reach, all the way. (:

I'm expecting some pretty awesome stuff. I enjoyed ODST, despite it being nothing new. Reach is supposed to be giving us a whole lot of new things.

I've personally not played MW2. I chose to get L4D2 instead. I know what I'm like with CoD games, I get overly stressed out.

Fun teamwork > Stress Heart Attack.

(:

I played MW1 and WaW religiously for like 2-3 months straight then let them collect dust forever. I'd just do the same with MW2. It'll be a waste of my money, simply because of how I am.

Avatar image for JM_MUFC
JM_MUFC

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#91 JM_MUFC
Member since 2009 • 352 Posts

Neither of these games interest me, Halo is full of idiots who just jump up and down, throw grenades and shoot stupid looking underpowered weapons. I would usually go for the COD game but i dont want to waste money on another Treyarch disaster and activitsion rip-off, give me Infinity Ward any day with a longer gap between the sequels and some aw360me DLC's then i'll happily buy it.

Avatar image for insanenub51
insanenub51

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 insanenub51
Member since 2006 • 98 Posts

i think call of duty 7 should be more like WaW than Mw2.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

Pretty sure there was no actual "War" in the Cold War, that was just a bunch of threats 2 countries made to fire nukes at eachother.

Another WW2 game makes it suck automatically and Cod4 was more popular than Cod5, so Cod6 will still be better than Cod7.

Halo Reach...

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

Neither of these games interest me, Halo is full of idiots who just jump up and down, throw grenades and shoot stupid looking underpowered weapons. I would usually go for the COD game but i dont want to waste money on another Treyarch disaster and activitsion rip-off, give me Infinity Ward any day with a longer gap between the sequels and some aw360me DLC's then i'll happily buy it.

JM_MUFC

meh, Halo actually takes "skill" of some sort to be good at.

I couldn't dream of a 20+ or even a 15+ game in Halo, I get 25+, 30s all the time in COD and my kill/death is a lot higher than my .6 in Halo.

MW2 is more fun for me, but in the end it has the worse multiplayer, terrible matchmaking, cheaters, glitchers etc.

Avatar image for JM_MUFC
JM_MUFC

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#95 JM_MUFC
Member since 2009 • 352 Posts

[QUOTE="JM_MUFC"]

Neither of these games interest me, Halo is full of idiots who just jump up and down, throw grenades and shoot stupid looking underpowered weapons. I would usually go for the COD game but i dont want to waste money on another Treyarch disaster and activitsion rip-off, give me Infinity Ward any day with a longer gap between the sequels and some aw360me DLC's then i'll happily buy it.

HavocV3

meh, Halo actually takes "skill" of some sort to be good at.

I couldn't dream of a 20+ or even a 15+ game in Halo, I get 25+, 30s all the time in COD and my kill/death is a lot higher than my .6 in Halo.

MW2 is more fun for me, but in the end it has the worse multiplayer, terrible matchmaking, cheaters, glitchers etc.

Glitchers.. Yes Terrible Matchmaking......Yes Cheaters......Not too many but worst of all is the fact that these are the crappest maps i have ever played on in an online game and yes i have played far cry 2! They are tiny, full of camping spots where n00bs sit to knife your legs when you run by or shoot you in the back as you sprint past... and also you are filled with dread everytime you enter the lobby wondering whether you are going to get a s#%t map or a boring map (although everytime it is a combination of both)
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="JM_MUFC"]

Neither of these games interest me, Halo is full of idiots who just jump up and down, throw grenades and shoot stupid looking underpowered weapons. I would usually go for the COD game but i dont want to waste money on another Treyarch disaster and activitsion rip-off, give me Infinity Ward any day with a longer gap between the sequels and some aw360me DLC's then i'll happily buy it.

JM_MUFC

meh, Halo actually takes "skill" of some sort to be good at.

I couldn't dream of a 20+ or even a 15+ game in Halo, I get 25+, 30s all the time in COD and my kill/death is a lot higher than my .6 in Halo.

MW2 is more fun for me, but in the end it has the worse multiplayer, terrible matchmaking, cheaters, glitchers etc.

Glitchers.. Yes Terrible Matchmaking......Yes Cheaters......Not too many but worst of all is the fact that these are the crappest maps i have ever played on in an online game and yes i have played far cry 2! They are tiny, full of camping spots where n00bs sit to knife your legs when you run by or shoot you in the back as you sprint past... and also you are filled with dread everytime you enter the lobby wondering whether you are going to get a s#%t map or a boring map (although everytime it is a combination of both)

and you're still playing it because ? ...you just like complaining on the internet lol.

Avatar image for JM_MUFC
JM_MUFC

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#97 JM_MUFC
Member since 2009 • 352 Posts

[QUOTE="JM_MUFC"][QUOTE="HavocV3"]

meh, Halo actually takes "skill" of some sort to be good at.

I couldn't dream of a 20+ or even a 15+ game in Halo, I get 25+, 30s all the time in COD and my kill/death is a lot higher than my .6 in Halo.

MW2 is more fun for me, but in the end it has the worse multiplayer, terrible matchmaking, cheaters, glitchers etc.

DranzarTypeF

Glitchers.. Yes Terrible Matchmaking......Yes Cheaters......Not too many but worst of all is the fact that these are the crappest maps i have ever played on in an online game and yes i have played far cry 2! They are tiny, full of camping spots where n00bs sit to knife your legs when you run by or shoot you in the back as you sprint past... and also you are filled with dread everytime you enter the lobby wondering whether you are going to get a s#%t map or a boring map (although everytime it is a combination of both)

and you're still playing it because ? ...you just like complaining on the internet lol.

Im still playing because i sold COD4, R6v2 disk broke, L4D2 completed and all my friends play mw2. I may enjoy it more when they bring out some map packs (hopefully soon) where the online gameplay has something to do with the rest of the game. Since when did the americans start fighting terrorists in a quarry??
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="JM_MUFC"] Glitchers.. Yes Terrible Matchmaking......Yes Cheaters......Not too many but worst of all is the fact that these are the crappest maps i have ever played on in an online game and yes i have played far cry 2! They are tiny, full of camping spots where n00bs sit to knife your legs when you run by or shoot you in the back as you sprint past... and also you are filled with dread everytime you enter the lobby wondering whether you are going to get a s#%t map or a boring map (although everytime it is a combination of both)JM_MUFC

and you're still playing it because ? ...you just like complaining on the internet lol.

Im still playing because i sold COD4, R6v2 disk broke, L4D2 completed and all my friends play mw2. I may enjoy it more when they bring out some map packs (hopefully soon) where the online gameplay has something to do with the rest of the game. Since when did the americans start fighting terrorists in a quarry??

lol...good point, but I don't think the game is meant to be realistic...notice its based 5 years in the future.

Avatar image for MobilechicaneX
MobilechicaneX

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 MobilechicaneX
Member since 2009 • 2863 Posts

Halo reach - Bungiesfinal halo game which will be using the new 'X' engine which will be the first game to use the xboxs ultimate potential.

Cod 7 - Seeing that treyach are making it, a re-skin of Cod 5/6, but if zombies is back ill love it.

But yeh reach for me, and btw i love both series.

Avatar image for MobilechicaneX
MobilechicaneX

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 MobilechicaneX
Member since 2009 • 2863 Posts

[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]

[QUOTE="JM_MUFC"] Glitchers.. Yes Terrible Matchmaking......Yes Cheaters......Not too many but worst of all is the fact that these are the crappest maps i have ever played on in an online game and yes i have played far cry 2! They are tiny, full of camping spots where n00bs sit to knife your legs when you run by or shoot you in the back as you sprint past... and also you are filled with dread everytime you enter the lobby wondering whether you are going to get a s#%t map or a boring map (although everytime it is a combination of both)JM_MUFC

and you're still playing it because ? ...you just like complaining on the internet lol.

Im still playing because i sold COD4, R6v2 disk broke, L4D2 completed and all my friends play mw2. I may enjoy it more when they bring out some map packs (hopefully soon) where the online gameplay has something to do with the rest of the game. Since when did the americans start fighting terrorists in a quarry??

1st and 2nd missions