GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Terminator: Dark Fate Flops At Box Office, Could Lose $100 Million

"The blood is still being scrubbed off the walls from those creative battles."

73 Comments

The new Terminator movie, Dark Fate, opened in theatres this weekend--and it came up short. The action movie starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, Linda Hamilton, and Mackenzie Davis, made only $29 million at the US box office. That makes it a flop, given the film reportedly cost close to $200 million to produce, according to Deadline. Variety reports that the movie cost $185 million to make, with up to $100 million more in marketing costs.

The site said a $29 million opening for the movie--which was directed by Deadpool's Tim Miller--is a "terrible result" and just the latest struggle for the Terminator franchise. 2015's Terminator: Genisys, which ultimately grossed just $90 million domestically, made only $27 million for its opening weekend in the US.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Terminator: Dark Fate - The Cast and Director On Working With James Cameron

The Terminator movies are made by film companies Paramount and Skydance, and Dark Fate is just their latest poorly performing movie. Their previous release, the Will Smith-starring Gemini Man, also bombed at the box office and is predicted to lose money.

Dark Fate was No. 1 at the US box office this weekend, but its $29 million opening was the lowest No. 1 first-weekend result for any movie since 2013's Ender's Game ($27 million).

Dark Fate was financed mainly by three companies--Paramount, Skydance, and Disney (via Fox). Each company put in 30 percent, with China's Tencent adding the rest. Variety reported that Dark Fate could end up losing $100 million at the box office, though those losses could be mitigated through deals for TV and streaming, along with rentals and other sources.

Dark Fate picked up decent review scores from critics, while the movie received a very solid B+ rating on CinemaScore (which measures audience reaction). If Paramount was trying to reinvigorate the series with a younger audience, that didn't really work. The movie's domestic box office was made up of only 25 percent of people in the 18-24 age bracket.

Behind the scenes, Dark Fate ran into problems as well. James Cameron, who wrote and directed the first Terminator movie and remains attached to the series as a producer, told CinemaBlend that there were "many" disagreements during the editing process.

"The blood is still being scrubbed off the walls from those creative battles. This is a film that was forged in fire," he recalled.

According to Cameron, Miller--the director--wanted more control over the direction of the film. "Tim wanted to make it his movie. And I'm like, 'Yeah, but I kind of know a little about this world.' So I had the matter and the anti-matter version of that producorial experience," he said.

You can see the full Top 10 box office chart below, as compiled by EW.

October 25-27 US Box Office:

  1. Terminator: Dark Fate —$29 million
  2. Joker — $14 million
  3. Maleficent: Mistress of Evil — $12.2 million
  4. Harriet — $12 million
  5. The Addams Family — $8.5 million
  6. Zombieland 2: Double Tap — $7.4 million
  7. Countdown — $5.9 million
  8. Black and Blue — $4.1 million
  9. Motherless Brooklyn — $3.7 million
  10. Arctic Dogs — $3.1 million

More on Terminator: Dark Fate:

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 73 comments about this story
73 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 73 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for boobytrap
BoobyTrap

716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

It’s a very decent movie and it’s unfortunate that it’s gonna be plagued with these articles a-la “getting good reviews and being number 1 at the box office means nothing when it didn’t gross a billion dollars in the first minute of its release” LOL

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

I don't know about anyone else, but when I first heard James Cameron was involved, I got excited. Then I heard that Cameron didn't have as much control as we all thought and that Miller was doing everything he could to make it his movie. That's when I decided to take a "wait and see" approach to the movie. I suppose everyone else did, too.

8 • 
Avatar image for deliverersbestfriend
DeliverersBestFriend

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Barighm: according to the article it's the other way around. james cameron had his way and miller had little control over the movie.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Archangel2222
Archangel2222

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Barighm: Yet cameron was responsible for wanting John dead he was the one who pushed for that opening scene. It was baffling by far his biggest mistake ever I feel. John has more charisma in his pinkie than Danie Freaken Ramos

2 • 
Avatar image for JIMDOG4442002
JIMDOG4442002

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@Barighm: Yeah I didnt know Miller was in charge, now after seeing the movie I see now why it went in that direction.

2 • 
Avatar image for ToadstoolPeach
ToadstoolPeach

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

You'd think they'd have learned their lesson by this point. Just leave Terminator alone, it ended perfectly in T2.

8 • 
Avatar image for eisenhorn
Eisenhorn

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

It's 110% pure woke garbage. They make their intentions known before the main titles have passed when they kill John Conner. That the good terminator sent back is some androgynous thing and the new saviour of man... sorry, peoplekind is a generic teenage girl (latina too, got to tick them diversity boxes) is a clear indication that this franchise don't need no man, besides Arnie for nostalgia points.
It's a terrible movie in its own right besides the ham fisted social justice shit we're forcefed throughout it. I hope with this latest turd in what should never have been a franchise in the first place bombing that we'll finally see it cast aside.

21 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@eisenhorn: It was always meant and designed to end at T2. Thankfully, the first two movies still hold up.

8 • 
Avatar image for Elranzer
Elranzer

1422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Barighm: T2 had a real sequel in the form of Terminator 3-D at Universal Studios. It had Arnold, Linda Hamilton and Eddie Furlong defeating the last remains of Skynet and fighting the T-1,000,000.

As far as I’m concerned, that’s the true end of the series.

3 • 
  • 73 results
  • 1
  • 2