GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

New PlayStation Plus Subscription Launches In June With Three Tiers

PlayStation has revealed its Game Pass competitor, includes up to 700 games.

133 Comments

PlayStation has officially unveiled the next generation of PlayStation Plus, and it's going to be a little more complicated for newcomers. As expected, the relaunch of the PlayStation subscription service will combine the perks of PS Plus and PlayStation Now, and the highest level will offer some of the same features available on Xbox Game Pass. When the subscription launches in June, it will be available as three separate tiers: PlayStation Plus, PlayStation Plus Extra, and PlayStation Plus Premium. The Premium subscription will feature up to 700-plus games.

The standard PS Plus subscription will be rebranded to PlayStation Plus Essential. Despite the new name, it's functionally the same services. PS Plus Essential will cost $60 per year and feature the same perks, including free games each month, cloud storage, online multiplayer, and discounts during select sales.

PlayStation Plus Extra will cost $15 per month or $100 per year and features up to 400 PS4 and PS5 games. Sony's description of the Extra tier is a bit vague, but subscribers will be able to download the games in the library to their console to play. It'll include both first-party and third-party games. Considering the number of games in this tier, it sounds pretty much like a combination of PlayStation Plus and PlayStation Now, which will be discontinued in June. Current PlayStation Now subscribers will be converted to PS Plus Extra subscribers at launch.

The most expensive of the bunch, PlayStation Plus Premium, will feature "up to 340 additional games" versus the Extra tier. PlayStation Plus Premium will cost $18 per month or $120 per year. The Premium tier's additional games appear to largely focus on the PlayStation back catalog, with original PlayStation, PS2, PS3, and PSP games available to play. PS3 games will be locked to cloud streaming, but at least some of the other backwards compatible classics will be downloadable.

The Premium tier comes with a couple other perks, including limited-time game trials and cloud streaming on PC. All three subscription tiers will be available on PS5 and PS4, though PS5 users will get access to more games.

PlayStation has confirmed a handful of PS5 and PS4 games that will be available to Extra and Premium subscribers at launch:

  • Death Stranding
  • God of War
  • Marvel's Spider-Man
  • Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
  • Mortal Kombat 11
  • Returnal (PS5 exclusive)

PlayStation Plus Extra and Premium will be available in Asia first, but it sounds like North American and European users will be able to subscribe in June as well. If you live in a region where cloud streaming isn't supported for PlayStation, you'll have a chance to subscribe to PlayStation Plus Deluxe for a lower price. Pricing details for the United States, Europe, UK, and Japan can be found below.

PlayStation Plus Essential

  • United States - $10/month | $15/quarter | $60/year
  • Europe - €9/month | €25/quarter | €60/year
  • United Kingdom - £7/month | £20/quarter | £50/year
  • Japan - ¥850/month | ¥2,150/quarter | ¥5,143/year

PlayStation Plus Extra

  • United States - $15/month | $40/quarter | $100/year
  • Europe - €14/month | €40/quarter | €100/year
  • United Kingdom - £11/month | £32/quarter | £84/year
  • Japan - ¥1,300/month | ¥3,600/quarter | ¥8,600/year

PlayStation Plus Premium

  • United States - $18/month | $50/quarter | $120/year
  • Europe - €17/month | €50/quarter | €120/year
  • United Kingdom - £13.49/month | £40/quarter | £100/year
  • Japan - ¥1,550/month | ¥4,300/quarter | ¥10,250/year

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 133 comments about this story
133 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for chaosemerald
chaosemerald

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Seems like a good deal if you are REALLY into older and classic games. If not though likely not much point.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cboye18
cboye18

4153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

@chaosemerald: I mean, a cheap PC with emulators can you give you all of that and more.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@cboye18: Er...no. Only the newest CPUs can handle PS3 and Xbox emulation. And let's face it, 95% of the population doesn't care about the "more".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for onehitta323
onehitta323

2245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Edited By onehitta323

One hell of a deal Sony. $120 a year for over 700 games plus all other bells and whistles? Games from all playstations? All in on this. Great price and value here. If you can't afford $120 a year for premium, then mcdonalds is hiring. Literally $10 bucks a month. Love it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for faithxvoid
faithxvoid

941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Isn't game pass ultimate only $15 a month?

You get the same back catalog access without streaming, you get streaming to anything with a web browser, you get EA plus, you get xbox and pc games, 4 free games vs 3 now for ps plus...

Why would you do this Sony? You're releasing a $300,000 Honda civic to compete with a $250000 Bentley.

4 • 
Avatar image for mpl911
mpl911

1226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@faithxvoid: I'll take the $300,000 Honda thanks. I'd sell it to buy the £250,000 Bentley and pocket the change. Ker-ching!!

3 • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

If I was to think about what option to take for example the highest tier $18/month may seem reasonable but that is taken at face value until you do the math. 12 X$18 is $216 per year if one pays $18 per month and for me $120 is a deal rather than paying monthly which gives Sony extra money.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dugdiggler
DugDiggler

154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

PSOne games also? Sign me up today! They should’ve offered this a long time ago in my opinion. I just hope they offer some great games and don’t stiff us on some of the classics that already have remasters or remakes (RE 1, 2 and 3). While those remakes are good, I still love the originals just as much. It’ll also be nice to play some great RPG games from that era that haven’t had any sort of re release or remaster (Parasite Eve and Xenogears notably)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for olddadgamer
OldDadGamer

3779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

OldDadGamer  Moderator

All I can say is every suggestion in the article and comments guessing what Sony would name this was better than what they named it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for johnny0779
johnny0779

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Game Trials, and charging for backwards compatibility is the best Sony can do?

Not even any Sony movies or Crunchyroll access?

What a disappointment of a subscription service.

7 • 
Avatar image for DereksDontRun
DereksDontRun

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

They aren’t trying hard enough. And it’s not a good deal for most of us.

But I am glad to see them taking things a little more seriously if only to put a slight amount of pressure on Microsoft to make Game Pass even better. Competition is good for the consumer. Even half hearted competition.

2 • 
Avatar image for RSM-HQ
RSM-HQ

12599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 94

User Lists: 1

@DereksDontRun: Honestly I'd have liked an even lower tier that only gave online multiplayer, because I do not give a shit about the other perks.

My guess is they knew many people only use the service for multiplayer, so they'd rather not give a cheaper alternative. It's an anti-customer move, but Sony does that quite often anyway.

5 • 
Avatar image for cboye18
cboye18

4153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

@RSM-HQ: They should make online multiplayer free again.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DereksDontRun
DereksDontRun

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@RSM-HQ: I also get the sense that these services on the surface look like they’re aimed at the same audience, but from my perspective they aren’t. So with Gamepass you get new exclusives like Halo Infinite, Forza Horizon 5 and Starfield. It also offers small independent games that are fun to give a try for the price of a monthly subscription, but that you probably wouldn’t even look at for purchase.

The Sony version seems to be for people who aren’t as committed to gaming as I am. Let me clarify: I own a PS5 and a Series X. And several Nintendo Switches. I am not a fanboy of any company. What I’m saying about not being as committed is that the games that Sony is offering as their big enticements don’t interest me, because I already own them all. I’ve already finished almost all of them. And so this service doesn’t make sense for me in the way that Gamepass does.

I think this service is aimed at a much more casual audience, and maybe that’ll be enough to make it a success. Ask yourself this: does anyone you personally know in the real world love games, or play them as much as you do? If you’re reading the comments on this article I‘ll bet that you’re probably the gaming guru of your circle of friends and acquaintances, but that most of them do still play games. This will appeal to them.

Again it’s competition for the other companies. Which is good for us. I don’t care about any company winning the console wars. In fact I don’t want to see a winner. I want all of the companies to be on unsure footing, because their competitors are just a few steps behind or ahead of them. They all need to sweat, and worry. Otherwise we will get nothing but overpriced garbage.

2 • 
Avatar image for RSM-HQ
RSM-HQ

12599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 94

User Lists: 1

Edited By RSM-HQ

@DereksDontRun: I don't really have an issue with these collection of game services for games that come or go, for those who want it. For the way I play games it is a waste of money and time.

As such my issue is if they ever have a game I was interested in? I already own it, so paying a fee overtime would eventually be over the price I paid for the product, and that's assuming the game 'remains' on the service as these games do rotate. As such both Microsoft and Sony tell you what games (they think) you should be playing. No different from a parent picking out games for a child over the child picking a game themselves.

So with that analogy these services limit what games are on peoples radar instead of the expansive nature of the hobby, Sony nor Microsoft have games high in large what I care to play (that I do not already own), they want to control what content we play and we pay to do so, and that doesn't personally speak to me. many these offered games on Microsoft's side also have microtransactions on an already paying service. . . no thank you. Paying to pay more seems silly. Sony also has GT on the list which is a P2W hell-hole.

If someone doesn't care what they play and just wants overall good value per game and ignores the second hand console market? sure these services are neat. But you may not like what they offer and feel caught in a rut of games you was never interested in to begin-with. And chances are a game you was interested in was already rotated out, keep in mind this service isn't free so yeah. Not for me, but for those that like it? cool. I do see the value, it's just not valuable to me.

Just give me a cheaper way to play online Microsoft and Sony (I'd prefer free like P.C. but they'll never do it in 2022), I couldn't give a poop for the collection of selected rotating games, that in some cases have P2W models in them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DereksDontRun
DereksDontRun

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@RSM-HQ: Again, I think that you are a very committed gamer. You know the hobby on a granular level. You’re not the target audience of this service. And again I’m hoping that this new service will be a success, and exert pressure on the competition, because it will appeal to more casual gamers.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RSM-HQ
RSM-HQ

12599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 94

User Lists: 1

@DereksDontRun: Oh no I was in complete agreement with you, just expressing my perspective. Though not sure on the committed part. I work very long hours lol.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tbird7586
tbird7586

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By tbird7586

Who would've thought the company that's getting as greedy as take 2 and Ubisoft would charge more than a much better service but wait you get demos and old games! So instead of backwards compatibility you make sure folks have to pay to play legacy games sure that checks out super not greedy move

4 • 
Avatar image for dmblum1799
dmblum1799

1739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

@tbird7586: The problem is with Ubisoft is that their games are fun for a bout 10 minutes then they are a total drag.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dmblum1799
dmblum1799

1739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

120 bucks per year? NP. I have the Microsoft premium X/S and I don't really use it much, but, compared to other things 120 bucks a year is nothing.

3 • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By lonewolf1044

@dmblum1799: I feel the same after adding $18/month which adds up to $216 which is an ripoff.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ZombieVirolina
ZombieVirolina

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If they were trying to impress me, then I was about as impressed as I was when they announced their blockbuster acquisition of Bungie. 😑

8 • 
Avatar image for flyingfrog
FlyingFrog

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@ZombieVirolina: boohoo look at me, nothing's ever good enough for my liking

4 • 
Avatar image for ZombieVirolina
ZombieVirolina

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@flyingfrog: So mediocrity is an acceptable practice to you? Tell me, you must have so many “participation” trophies on your shelf. 🤣

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pillarrocks
pillarrocks

4168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

Surprised how much the higher tiers cost for a year. I am gonna just stick with Playstation Plus.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EPKent
EPKent

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Microsoft is laughing right now

7 • 
Avatar image for cboye18
cboye18

4153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

@EPKent: Consumer aren't though. It's like a competition of nickle and diming. I'm quite sick of everything turning into subscriptions already.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EPKent
EPKent

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cboye18: yes I agree. The ideology of a traditional customer is dead

2 • 
Avatar image for xnshd
xNSHD

3169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

$18 dollars no thanks. rip off if that doesnt include day 1 exclusives.

6 • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@xnshd: Not only you do not get exclusives you are paying $216 if monthly and Sony is pocketing and getting richer hoping people opt for the monthly plan.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xnshd
xNSHD

3169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@lonewolf1044: the are hoping people opt for the yearly plan which locks them into the service for a year. which is why it works out cheaper. sony know the service isnt as worthwhile as game pass so are trying to lock you down to a yearly subscription instead of just buying a month or 2 and then leaving.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rolento25
Rolento25

2835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

what a great detailed article on this....

Oh right, we'll need about 10 more articles to explain it, instead of one.

7 •