GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Age of Conan Hardware Performance Guide

We journeyed through the Age of Conan to test our hardware against the might of the Hyborian kingdoms.

127 Comments

Age of Conan: Hyborian Adventures, Funcom's new massively multiplayer online role-playing game, lets players develop their characters and explore the mythical world of Hyboria. The game offers excellent graphics but also comes with equally breathtaking PC system requirements. Much of the game runs without a hitch, but like many MMORPGs, the true test of the hardware is in the large cities. High population counts, towering spires, long view distances, and tremendous amounts of shadowing all combine to make game frame rates about as viscous as corn syrup. Weaker computers will grind to a stop, while more powerful machines will limp along at less than half or even a third of their usual performance when faced with these large city environments. There isn't much you can do to avoid the frame rate hit, but you can upgrade a few key components to make the game a bit more playable.

Server conditions, population activity, and numerous other conditions make testing MMORPGs difficult. We increased our usual test duration to three minutes and used FRAPs to measure frame rates to compensate for the variability of our test runs. Our test ran through the streets of Old Terantia where we wound our way from the East Gate to the docks and back. The path has a mix of long view distances, heavily trafficked areas, and graphically varied regions that make the test brutal on the system hardware, as well as representative of the different scenery that the game offers. We found that the city test represents the absolute worst case scenario. We easily saw our frame rates double as soon as we stepped outside of cities, and combat instances in enclosed areas proved much less taxing than the civil environments.

Game Settings
Age of Conan has lots of adjustable settings and sliders, but most of them don't affect performance. However, there are a few settings you can tweak to easily double performance.

Graphics
The game's minimum system requirements starts with a GeForce 6600 video card, but we'd be surprised if you could do any more than look at the title screen with such an old card. We went through almost 20 video cards to identify the video cards that give you the most bang for your buck.

CPU
We've said it before, and we'll say it again: Toss your single-core processor in the dust bin of obsolete technology. Age of Conan practically requires a dual-core processor to run at all. We tested various speed quad-core, dual-core, and single-core CPUs from both Intel and AMD to help you decide where to devote your CPU budget.

Memory
Age of Conan requires 1GB of RAM to run, but that's barely enough to get the computer to boot in Windows Vista. We went ahead and tested the game with 2GB and 3GB of RAM to see what more reasonable amounts of system memory can do for performance.

Systems

A machine that featured the minimum system requirements--3GHz Pentium 4 processor, GeForce 6600 128MB video card, and 1GB of system memory--seemed reasonable, but we decided to build a test machine to see how the game performed on a system with the minimum required specifications. We didn't have many of the older parts, but we got close. We had to bump up the processor to a 3.2GHz Pentium 4 and blew the dust off an old GeForce 6800. Even with slightly more powerful components, the game could barely run. We got the game to move at a semifluid pace in city environments with rock bottom settings, but playing on the min-spec system wasn't an enjoyable experience.

The game runs much better on a PC with the recommended 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, GeForce 7900 GTX 512MB, and 2GB DDR2 memory system components. The recommended hardware let us crank the detail up to medium settings and even bump the resolution to 1600x1200 while maintaining very playable frame rates. The game played buttery smooth outside of the city areas.

Our self-proclaimed awesome system, a 3GHz Core 2 Quad with a GeForce 9800 GTX and 2GB of DDR2 RAM, ran the game without a hitch. We turned the settings up to high to experience Hyboria in all of its splendor.

System Setup:

Awesome System: Intel Core2 QX9650, eVGA 780i, 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2), 750GB Seagate 7200.11 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1. Graphics Card: GeForce 9800 GTX, beta Nvidia ForceWare 175.16.

Recommended System: Intel Core2 Duo E6600, eVGA 780i, 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2), 750GB Seagate 7200.11 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1. Graphics Card: GeForce 7900 GTX, beta Nvidia ForceWare 175.16.

Minimum System: Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz, Asus P4C800, 1GB Corsair XMS Memory (512MBx2), Seagate 160GB 7200.7 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows XP Professional SP2. Graphics Card: GeForce 6800, beta Nvidia Forceware 175.16.

Game Settings

Age of Conan has numerous settings, but most won't help you regain performance if you have a moderately powerful video card. As with most games, the one major performance guzzler has to be shadowing. If you disable shadows in all their forms, you can get immediate frame rate gains. We nearly doubled our performance simply by disabling shadows and leaving all the other settings at high quality. If disabling shadows isn't enough, we also recommend reducing the resolution and view distance to get the game to run smoother on less powerful video cards.

You might also want to look at the bloom setting. It saps performance, and its benefits are purely subjective. High quality settings with bloom-produced walls create an overly bright and unnatural appearance. However, bloom became a bit more enticing with shadows disabled because the added color and light helped to offset the lack of blacks that the shadows provided. Check out how it looks on the following page and decide if it's worth the performance hit.

System Setup: Intel Core2 QX9650, eVGA 780i, 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2), 750GB Seagate 7200.11 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1. Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 GT, Nvidia ForceWare 175.16.

Image Quality Comparison

Preset Quality Settings

High Medium Low


Bloom

Enabled Disabled


Shadow Settings

Everything People Disabled

Image Quality Comparison Continued

Shadow Resolution Settings

High Medium Low


Shader Model

2.0 2.x 3.0


View Distance Sliders

100% 75% 50% 25% 10%


Water Reflections

Everything Ground None

Video Cards

Our test stresses video cards, but the CPU plays a much greater role in Age of Conan. The game runs well outside of the city, but all those extra frames don't do you much good if the game slows to a crawl once you get to the city. Our city-based test lumped almost all of the newer video cards into one big, CPU-limited basket. If you're going to upgrade your video card for Age of Conan, look no further than the GeForce 8800 GT.

During our testing, we found that Age of Conan doesn't play nice with ATI video cards. Aside from performance concerns, the ATI cards we tested locked two of the view distance sliders permanently to their maximum settings, and there isn't much you can do about it yet. Because of the locked sliders, we could only directly compare ATI and Nvidia cards at high quality settings. The game also has two entirely different preset medium quality settings for Nvidia and ATI cards; as a result, the "medium" image quality for the two sets of cards look nothing alike. The main difference between the two sets of medium settings comes from the main view distance range setting. On Nvidia cards, medium settings force the main view distance range to 2000 meters, down from 2800 meters in high quality mode. The draw distance number plunges to 200 meters on ATI cards. We tested both GPU brands with matching high quality settings but had to separate out the rest into their own charts for the other quality settings.  

We would have also liked to test DirectX10 on Age of Conan, but those features have yet to be added to the game.

Nvidia ATI

System Setup: Intel Core2 QX9650, eVGA 780i SLI, 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2), 750GB Seagate 7200.11 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1. Graphics Cards: GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB, GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB, GeForce 9600 GT 256MB, GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB, GeForce 8800 GT 512MB, GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB, GeForce 7900 GS 256MB, GeForce 7600 GT 256MB, GeForce 6800 128MB, Radeon HD 3870X2 1GB, Radeon HD 3870 512MB, Radeon HD 3850 512MB, Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB, Radeon HD 2600 Pro 256MB, Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB, Radeon X1650 XT 256MB. Graphics Drivers: beta Nvidia ForceWare 175.16, ATI Catalyst 8.5

CPU

A fast CPU is absolutely essential to Age of Conan. Single-core processors cannot run the game with high quality settings. These older CPUs fail to feed information to the other components in a timely manner. As a result, texture swaps occur at increasingly later points in the scene; sometimes they didn't happen at all until we stopped and waited for the game to catch up. It's like typing on a slow computer and waiting for the letters to appear onscreen seconds after you type them. You can get away with upgrading to a fast dual-core processor because the game doesn't seem to take advantage of quad-core processors at all. Clock speed is far more important than having an extra two cores in the game. If you have the means to overclock your CPU, we highly recommend doing so for Age of Conan. 

System Setup: Intel Core2 Extreme QX9650, Intel Core2 Quad Q9450, Intel Core2 Duo E8400, Intel Core2 Duo E8200, Intel Core2 Duo E6420, eVGA 780i. AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60, AMD Athlon 64 4000+, AMD Phenom X3 8750, AMD Phenom X4 9600 Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H. 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2), 750GB Seagate 7200.11 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit. Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 GT, beta Nvidia ForceWare 175.16.

Memory

Windows Vista barely runs with 1GB of RAM, so it comes as no surprise that the game chokes with only 1GB of RAM. We could fire up the game, but load times were atrocious and the poor frame rate performance made benchmarking pointless. Performance improved dramatically when we moved up to 2GB. We didn't see frame rate gains at 3GB, but load times improved and the perpetual hard drive churn seemed to decrease.  

System Setup: Intel Core2 Extreme QX9650, eVGA 780i, 3GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2 + 512MBx2), 2GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2), Corsair XMS Memory 1GB, 1GB Corsair XMS Memory (512MBx2), 750GB Seagate 7200.11 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit. Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 GT, Nvidia ForceWare 175.16.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 127 comments about this story
127 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for kzoneoo1
kzoneoo1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By kzoneoo1

"There isn't much you can do to avoid the frame rate hit, but you can upgrade a few key components to make the game a bit more playable. " What are you talking about? I have a dual core 6400 with 4 gig ram and 9800 gtx, game runs great on max settings. Yes it will hick up once in awhile but enough with the BS becuse its slow for you...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ISuperGamerI
ISuperGamerI

3292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By ISuperGamerI

@ 666NightsInHell You obviously do not know what you are talking about. Stop being a fanboy.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xche78x
xche78x

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By xche78x

dear yoyags, your computer is good but as you can see there are 2 major components in there that didnt meet the recommended spec for AOC:HA Pentium Dual Core is just a rebranded Pentium D, hence this is not as powerful as the Intel Core 2 Duo. And your Graphics maybe able to dish out some DX10 effects but it is just slightly better than a Geforce 7600. It is not as fast and powerful as the Geforce 7800/7900! and since the test uses Windows XP (and you should too) the DX10 capabilities of you GPU is not used at all. thats means your GPU is just the same as a Geforce 7600. and in some occasions the old GF 6800 may even beat your gfx card in raw power. Suggested Solution: upgrade to a core 2 duo or quad and geforce 8800/9800 for maximum experience! PS, your system can run the game at low to medium details, expect lags on heavy areas! and to gamespot, your awesome pc is not that great, how about 9800gx2, 2x 9800gx2 (quad sli) and geforce 280 tri sli? and of course their ATI counterparts! skulltrail 8 core (2x qx9770) anyone?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for yoyags
yoyags

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By yoyags

i know absolutly nothing about comuters, but i need to know what specs so i can easily play this. not perfect, but good enough so i dont get pissed off. plz help me email me if you can yoyags@aol.com 8600GT 512MB video card. 250GB 7200RPM SATA-II Hard Drive 2GB High Speed DDR2-667 Memory and then all this # ntel Pentium Dual Core E2180 2.0GHz Processor # 2GB High-Speed DDR2-667 Memory # Western Digital 250GB SATA-2 Hard Drive # 20X Dual-Layer DVDRW w/Lightscribe # NVIDIA 8600GT 512MB PCIe DX10 Video Card # (2) SATA I-II / (1) x16 PCIe / (1) x1 PCIe / (2) PCI # 22-in-1 Media Reader # Onboard 10/100 LAN # Onboard AC ’97 6-Channel Audio # (2) USB 2.0 Ports " Upgradeable to 8 Ports. # X-Blade Aluminum Gaming Chassis # Black Internet Keyboard # Black Mouse # Logitech 2pc Speakers # 585 Watt High-Efficiency Power Supply

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Shas_La_Kais
Shas_La_Kais

497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Shas_La_Kais

targetlkd, No other game I own has any of the performance issues I get with Conan. I'm thinking it's the developer not optimizing the game for the current drivers very well.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for solidmaster
solidmaster

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By solidmaster

Very good guide, I know now that I have to shoot for fast cpu and 2GB+ of ram and not to spend much on the graphic card.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for targetlkd
targetlkd

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By targetlkd

It's a dam shame how Conan was advertised with Direct X10 but only works in DX9 during release and still one month later, there's also no SLI support, no quad core support... This game is so great and will be so much better once these major performance issues are taken care. As of right now you will get the same performance on a single 8800gt as you would get with a 9800GX2, a $450+ card vs a $175....... there's an issues with conan only using a percentage of our GPU. some say it's bad drivers from nvidia but how many other games out there decrease or stay the same in performance when you upgrade hardware?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kent6650
kent6650

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By kent6650

wow. ati got good textures compared to nvidia. i'm guessing it's driver issues. anyway, nice info. my 8800gt oc and q6600 would be enough although not on the very distant viewing range or something. and yeah most mmo's got the lag when there are a lot of people roaming around you if seen on screen. haha.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for peeweeshift
peeweeshift

3909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

Edited By peeweeshift

woah the water looks like a system hog

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dylan545
dylan545

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By dylan545

Tnx Grillbar, good tip.. I use it often 2, to bad it said i can't run Age of Conan... xD

Upvote • 
Avatar image for grillbar
grillbar

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By grillbar

ups diddent mean to post it 2 times:D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for grillbar
grillbar

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By grillbar

go to www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest there choose age of conan then you problerly have to install something called active x a ( its not a virus) and then you can see how well you system compares to the game there is a minimum and a req and if you can not run it, it will tell you what of your hardware is failing and what you should buy to meet the req you need for that specifik game check it out its really good

Upvote • 
Avatar image for grillbar
grillbar

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By grillbar

go to http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest under age of conan then you will have to install some active x (not a virus or anything like that) and it will tell you roughly if you can run it with you system and hardware and if not what is recomended hardware you can see both minimum and req lvls + theres a lot of other games to test if needed just a freindly advise i use it often

Upvote • 
Avatar image for IDarkNight
IDarkNight

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By IDarkNight

men, you have a 8800 GT. It's obiouslly you can run it perfectly.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DivineChampion
DivineChampion

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By DivineChampion

Intel E6600 XFX 8800 GT 2 Gigabytes of DDR2 I run it at high settings at 1280 X 1024 resolution and it honestly runs pretty well. In main cities i get no annoying loading or lag.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for 666NightsInHell
666NightsInHell

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By 666NightsInHell

Why this crap intel system and geforce.. i p[prefer ati and amd.. so useless post for me

Upvote • 
Avatar image for scionwolf321
scionwolf321

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By scionwolf321

..it looks good with graphics...but I still like wow a lot better

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shriek_213
shriek_213

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By shriek_213

what about the 7950 gx2? can it run AOC?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lathan94
lathan94

482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

Edited By lathan94

This is a very impressive looking game for an MMO.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sewie_123
sewie_123

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By sewie_123

I run a Nvidia 6800 with AoC- (AMD 4200+,2 Gig).. I can do ok in OLD TARANTIA (Gamespot: note spelling). Yup, gotta play with the settings. I usually leave things at 1600x1200, start with High settings and: 1) Turn off Shadows 2) Turn off Grass (natch) 3) Turn off Water Reflections 4) Turn Particle quality to low... and Shader 2.0. I'll get lows of 15, but run around 25-30. OH! And those are with bootleg NVidia drivers: I'm running the 174 series right now. There are newer ones out there now, but if you have an old card, you'll have to look for them. I HIGHLY recommend them. I just think they let the thing out of beta too soon. Or more likely, spent much of the development time polishing up the boobs and making cooler fatality moves. Once crafting comes into its own, I'll probably love it. Right now, I'll just wait.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Nekromenos
Nekromenos

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Nekromenos

The next MMO should be called "Age of Crysis".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for denter21
denter21

1283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By denter21

Their "awesome system" isn't very awesome.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EightBitWarrior
EightBitWarrior

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By EightBitWarrior

to sniperhare: we'll get dx10 when we get the rest of the game..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MichaelGeorge70
MichaelGeorge70

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MichaelGeorge70

is it me or do the view distance tests look the same?? compared to oblivion where min draw distance meant running around a world of fog??? game looks sweet shame about monthly fees if it was free dl try for a month then subscribe i'd give it a go but £20 for a game i can test for what 1-2 weeks no thanks..... nevermind looked onto the nvida vs ati draw distance and ROLF gutted ati fans

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sniperhare
sniperhare

674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By sniperhare

I wonder when we'll get DX10 in this game?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ordinateur
ordinateur

1951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By ordinateur

So low settings aren't bugged anymore? I'm getting 15~60FPS at high shadow off bloom on 1680x1050, E4500, 2GB RAM, 8600M GT DDR2 475/1450/500, Vista64 And articrecon, the 7900GS is never gonna run DX10 lol.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Jerian
Jerian

284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jerian

7900?? no offense man but if your that far back might as well wait for the 360 version.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ArticRecon
ArticRecon

193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By ArticRecon

That and damnit, come on NVIDIA, release a GOOD driver for 7900GS's to run Vista so I can use DX10 already!!!!!! This has been pissing me off for a while, supposedly Alienware has released a driver, I installed it and then the SLI wont work, WTF?????? Bout to can this PC

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ArticRecon
ArticRecon

193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By ArticRecon

What about 7900 GS SLI ??? 28 x 2=56?? or 28 on High settings, I would like to hope so.. but i'm not so sure....I dont want to pick this game up and not run worth a damn....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pentamaroonis
pentamaroonis

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By pentamaroonis

I have 2 8800gts's 640mb 2 gigs ram and 3ghz dual core. I run the game at 1680/1050 with shadows disabled. usually between 35-70fps, sometimes bogs down to 20 at the most intense places....very playble, this game rocks =D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BontraXenderKyl
BontraXenderKyl

706

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By BontraXenderKyl

The Monster isn't here... I mean GTX 280

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Masoud03
Masoud03

150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Masoud03

wheres the god Powered GTX 280 ?? i think the bar wouldn't fit in the screen :D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SrTVBR
SrTVBR

698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

Edited By SrTVBR

I get FPS like the Awesome System. This game is beautiful on High Quality.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Shas_La_Kais
Shas_La_Kais

497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Shas_La_Kais

Actually OgreB, if the OS can't see that extra gig of RAM it means it can't use it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OgreB
OgreB

2523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By OgreB

XP only sees 3 gigs....doesn't mean it won't use 4.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Shas_La_Kais
Shas_La_Kais

497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Shas_La_Kais

To add to this whole discussion: you shouldn't need 4GBs of RAM to play this. I've had this game for about a week and a half and a few days ago I've been getting memory leaks causing performance to take a huge nose dive and eventually crash the game. This game is pretty and fun, but after having the problems I have had the past few days I would not recommend picking this up until they release some sort of patch to fix up and optimize their game engine.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for LorDaftwager
LorDaftwager

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By LorDaftwager

ShadeofChaoS "You need 4G RAM to play AoC smoothly" The only ppl capable of using 4gb of ram are using vista 64bit But i guess ur probly one of the dufus' that went out and bought 4gb of ram and have yet to realise that only 3gb's works on your 32 bit OS If on the otherhand you are using 64bit you will find that programs now need twice the amount of ram to work hence you would need 8gb's of ram to get an improvemnet in performance and now your 4gb's that you are so proud of is actually causing a decrease in performance

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ShadeofChaoS
ShadeofChaoS

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By ShadeofChaoS

You need 4G RAM to play AoC smoothly.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for snax13
snax13

126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Edited By snax13

i think its funny that people are going out and spending thousands of dollars when i can run AOC on very high settings and built my computer for $800...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Scullyy
Scullyy

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Edited By Scullyy

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nightphantom64
nightphantom64

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By nightphantom64

I have a 8600 GT OC'd, a Pent. IV 3.2 GHz, and 3 gigs of RAM, and Windows XP 32-bit. I'm able to get an average of 40 FPS in tortage, and an average of 25 FPS out of tortage. Really, the game runs very smoothly.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Scullyy
Scullyy

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Edited By Scullyy

E6750 3.00GHZ OC, 8800gts 320mb and 2 gig ram. Runs the game at High quality with 30-50 fps. Sometimes it goes as high as 70fps and sometimes as low as 15 fps. Framerates are very unstable and I encounter a lot of lag spikes.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Skrotorr
Skrotorr

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Skrotorr

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Pete5506
Pete5506

10112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

Edited By Pete5506

I could run the game, its just that I dont play MMO's

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Nekromenos
Nekromenos

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Nekromenos

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Nekromenos
Nekromenos

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Nekromenos

Poeticinsomniac, you are wrong on all points. I'll even provide links to support my claims. First of all, a 32bit operating system like WinXP can be tweaked easily to support up to 3gb of ram. (http://www.pronetworks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=88544) Installing i.e. 4 sticks of 1gb each (4gb in total) will give you that result. No need for installing "odd amounts of ram". Second, I'm no nvidia fanboy. I've owned a bunch of gfx cards since I bought my first computer. Last ATI/AMD card I owned was a x1950pro which was amazing. That was before I got the XFX 8800GT. Now, I don't want to start an argument but seriously, the 2xxx ATI series was a total failure. I'm surprised you even have the guts to insist it delivers better performance on dx10 applications than nvidia cards... Here's a benchmark which is enough to eradicate any second thoughts you might have:

Upvote • 
Avatar image for londonrider
londonrider

279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Edited By londonrider

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

Upvote • 
Avatar image for vortex_gw
vortex_gw

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

Edited By vortex_gw

Good job gamespot. I am looking forward to more guides like this one when RA3 and other awesome games come out. This is what I like: Preset Quality Settings - Medium or High Bloom - disabled Shadows - Disabled or Everything

Upvote • 
Avatar image for snaeji10
snaeji10

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By snaeji10

Bloom disabled is much more realistic in my opinion......

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Targzissian
Targzissian

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Targzissian

I have 4.00GB installed but my "Total Physical Memory" is only 2.75GB because that's how Vista Home Premium 32-bit treats it. Still, that should be sufficient for this game, and I don't trust a 64-bit OS because it's not as well supported yet. I'm waiting for the DX10 version to buy this game, however. I'm looking forward to that, but there are other games to play in the meantime.

Upvote •