Review

The Acolyte Review - Not Messing Around

  • First Released Jun 4, 2024
    released
  • television
Phil Owen on Google+

Like Andor before it, The Acolyte actually thus far is good on its own merits.

There are three main kinds of Star Wars stories. There's the kind where you write whatever you want and call it Star Wars--a common occurrence with the many novels released in the 1990s. There's the kind where you recycle already existing Star Wars stories into something familiar--this has been Disney's primary way of doing things. But, lastly, there are the stories that enthusiastically make use of Star Wars as a setting to create something fresh. There have been a number of novels that fit that bill, as did the first season of Andor--and now, through four episodes, it seems that the new Star Wars series The Acolyte, set a century before the movies, also falls into that category.

The Acolyte centers on a pair of twins, Osha and Mae (both played by Amandla Stenberg). The girls were raised by an unaffiliated coven of female Force-users, but despite living outside the Republic, the Jedi-- including Carrie-Ann Moss's Indara--poked their noses into these women's affairs, leading to disaster. As a result, the sisters are separated for decades, each thinking the other dead--Osha ends up training to be a Jedi before washing out after a few years, and Mae, while everyone thinks she's dead, trains under a secret Sith master. When Mae emerges to hunt and kill the Jedi who made the incursion to her coven, Osha takes the blame and gets pulled right back into Jedi business as they go after her sister.

One thing that sets The Acolyte apart is the way it doesn't dilly dally with the reveal that Osha and Mae are separate people--the show begins by inferring that Osha has a normal life and moonlights as an assassin, but we learn the truth about Mae before the end of the first episode. A lesser Star Wars story would have tried to milk that mystery for several episodes at least.

But that's one of the many common franchise pitfalls that this series from showrunner Leslye Headland avoids several times during the episodes that were screened for critics. For example, every time it looks like we're about to be embroiled in some obnoxious and tropey contrivance, such as when the Jedi walk in on Osha standing over a dead body that she had discovered 15 seconds earlier, some character will quickly set the record straight so we don't have to waste several scenes dealing with nonsense. It's a beautiful thing, considering how much of the modern Star Wars franchise is built on that kind of wheel-spinning.

Likewise, they've managed something interesting with the aesthetic here. The Acolyte has all the same visual trappings of Star Wars and Marvel shows that use heavy doses of CGI, but avoids looking overly-reliant on that aesthetic by shooting on a lot of practical sets, dialing up the film grain, and going with a very dark look. The result isn't shockingly beautiful or anything like that, but it looks nice and the dark graininess hides the CGI pretty effectively.

No Caption Provided

Much more striking to me, though, is how neutral the tone of this series is, something that was likely made possible because of how far removed it is from the main franchise. This is a show that has a lot of familiar iconography but isn't reverent about it. The Jedi are just magic cops, and not treated as inherently good--you may bring that presupposition with you when you watch The Acolyte, but the series itself is not reinforcing that idea.

It can't, in fact, because it doesn't want to treat Mae as the villain. She's not going to have the Darth Vader/Kylo Ren redemption arc here, because she's a victim of circumstance just like her sister, both of whom were 8 years old when they were caught in between multiple groups of Force-users who wanted to control their future. The Acolyte isn't about Osha vs Mae--it feels much more like Osha and Mae vs everyone else.

The "everyone else" also includes some interesting figures, like Dafne Keen's Jedi apprentice Jecki, who Osha seems to develop a bit of a bond with, and Manny Jacinto's Qimir, who helps Mae on her hunts. But the most memorable of these others is Jedi Master Sol, played by Squid Game's Lee Jung-jae--Osha's former master, who has an earnest desire to make up for the mistake he and the other Jedi made with the coven. He knows that he and his co-workers were the original cause of this situation, and he feels responsible for handling the mess that has resulted in the present. Even though Lee apparently didn't know English before taking the role, he gives what is probably this show's best performance.

While I'm really digging the direction the show is taking through the first four episodes, there's reason to fear how this will tie into the main franchise plot eventually--the third episode plants the seeds for The Acolyte to serve as a direct precursor to the movies, but if that's going to happen, it'll be later on in the episodes I haven't seen yet. Could that end up ruining The Acolyte, if it does happen? It definitely could, yes. But the first four episodes are strong enough that I actually believe that Headland and co. might be able to make it work regardless.

Phil Owen on Google+
Back To Top

The Good

  • Doesn't waste time with pointless plot contrivances
  • Great performances in particular from Amandla Stenberg and Lee Jung-jae
  • A more neutral look at the Jedi than usual

The Bad

  • Hints at connections to the main franchise plot are troubling

About the Author

Phil Owen is a freelance writer who watched the first four episodes of The Acolyte, provided by Disney.
125 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for gamerpie
gamerpie

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

This is obviously a fake review if everyone on RT hates this programme

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bromax
bromax

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By bromax

The power of one, the power of two, THE POWEEER OFFF BAAAADDD REEEEVVVIEEEWSSS

Gamestop, please, stop reviewing films and series.

3 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-67f39d6a025ff
deactivated-67f39d6a025ff

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@chrismmm: I agree with a few things you said but I do think Disney is purposely hiring actors, writers, directors based on skin color, gender, and sexual preference. You are lying to yourself to not see that. Is that the reason this show is terrible? Absolutely not. But to declare that observation as bigotry is a cop-out.

5 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-67f39d6a025ff
deactivated-67f39d6a025ff

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Regardless of all these comments, gamespots reviews have been wildly inconsistent. This is the same writer who gave ahsoka a 2. Terrible show but so far it’s not that much worse than acolyte. I realize this is comparing a show to a movie but If this show is an 8 and Oppenheimer was a 9, that would mean there is nothing in between. This makes no sense to me. What kind of rubric is being used? Is it based on quality and entertainment value? Is there a rubric?

2 • 
Avatar image for patriotman
PatriotMan

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

😂😂😂😂😂 Got it!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Laughing at all the haters who rushed to judgement on this show.

5 • 
Avatar image for stickemup
StickEmUp

2245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By StickEmUp

@chrismmm: Guess you didn’t see that audiences have this at a 26% on Rotten Tomatoes. Lol.

9 • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@stickemup: I saw it, and rejected it in favor of the written review on Gamespot and the certified critic's score on Rotten Tomatoes. Audiences love to review bomb.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shalomanoray
Shalomanoray

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@chrismmm: no you rejected it in favor of you don’t wanna admit you’re wrong and would rather shoot yourself in the foot than change your mind.

6 • 
Avatar image for Thuban_23
Thuban_23

616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@chrismmm: And critics like to kiss ass even more. BTW there is no review bomb.

5 • 
Avatar image for naryanrobinson
naryanrobinson

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@chrismmm: What part of “audiences don't like the show” don't you understand, Chris?
You know how numbers work, right?
I swear you live in your own little bubble.

12 • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Chrismmm

@naryanrobinson: I’m in a bubble? 8/10 on Gamespot? sitting at 90% on RT Fresh. Okay then.

I'm just not in the conspiracy bubble thinking everything and everyone is paying every single tiny bill, bribe, and tax to manipulate my perception of reality, does that ring a bell some?

4 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-67f39d6a025ff
deactivated-67f39d6a025ff

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@chrismmm: I hope you are right and Disney is not actively continuing to destroy a beloved franchise. Unfortunately, after what they did to marvel, I do not trust them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Chrismmm

@plustwenty: I don’t see why any company would purposefully tank an IP like Star Wars. People need to remember, there was a LOT of bad star wars out before the Disney acquisition, people just did not care about it as much because it reached a smaller audience.

And there was no internet for the trolls to broadcast to the world…

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-67f39d6a025ff
deactivated-67f39d6a025ff

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@chrismmm: I never said they would destroy franchises on purpose. It’s a business. Their priority is profit. (The same as gamespot) Sometimes businesses make mistakes. Disney has made a lot of mediocre to bad content recently. There is no sugar coating it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@plustwenty: The ultimate death of Star Wars, I think, will be merchandising, and that racket runs way, way further back in time than the Disney acquisition I guess is one of my bigger points. As great as George is, he intended to milk Star Wars for everything it was worth, which is not much different from what Disney is trying to do. We trade one beast for another, but the truth is neither have their eye on some prestigious award or attainable story goal at the end, the exist to enrich themselves and so they leech on every sing property they have, and Star Wars is a gold mine for them. I just consider myself along for the ride, overlook the dumb stuff, maybe grumble a complaint now and then, and settle in for some escapism.

It's when the hatred and bigotry come out of the fanbase that ruins that fun for me, and admittedly makes me combative. That includes people who feel the need to constantly point out and mock the ethnicities, races, and sexual preferences of actors, and it can sometimes extend to people I feel don't converse in good faith. I'm always willing to change my mind, but please, offer me something substantive to change it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By mogan  Moderator

@chrismmm: I think the backlash to the Prequels being bad was lesser than with Disney Star Wars being bad because social media and internet culture just wasn't as big a thing in '99 - '05 as it is today. Like, GameSpot didn't do movie reviews back then, or have comments on their articles, so you couldn't read a review here and then scroll down to read all the reasons why that review was wrong/paid for/propaganda. All that was sequestered off in the forums.

2 • 
Avatar image for G-Corleone
G-Corleone

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@mogan: the Disney trilogy is still worst than the prequels tho

7 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@G-Corleone: I think both trilogies are equally terrible.

2 • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@mogan: Agreed one hundred percent. I also look at all the Extended Universe stuff that came out over the years Some was fantastic, obviously. But most was crap, we just didn’t have any forum for all the culture warriors to come out of the cracks and complain about inclusivity and all that. I remember loving the prequels when they came out, despite knowing they were awful. But there was no prevailing narrative hanging over my head that “these movies suck, they’re woke, they ruined everything,” and I think that is the biggest difference. We’re either angry or defensive and it leaves little room for just pure enjoyment.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Mimbus
Mimbus

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@chrismmm:It's really disingenuous to brush off all criticism as “these movies suck, they’re woke, they ruined everything” because both the sequel trilogy and shows made huge mistakes.

"Somehow, Palpatine returned" is one of the worst examples. How about the "Holdo manoeuvre" retroactively making the whole death star business absolutely pointless since you could just smash an X-wing moving at light speed into anything and destroy it. The entire Kenobi show was an absolute travesty. Boba Fett had all his teeth pulled and was turned into a scrappy town sheriff. Han Solo's name has an origin, and it's because he flies solo, so they named him Han Solo, get it? Top tier writing right there.

How about Mandalorian Season three where apparently a random giant bird was regularly eating their kids, and their only response was "Oh it lives too far away so we can't chase it." Even goddamn meerkats post sentries to watch out for danger when they're grazing, but apparently a bunch of mandalorians with high-tech sci-fi armor couldn't figure out how to keep an eye on the sky so a giant bird won't literally eat their children?

Just because some far-right trolls have a problem with Rey being a woman and Finn being black doesn't mean that all criticism of the trilogy is automatically sexist and racist.

Every single Star Wars product released by Disney with the exception of The Force Awakens, Mandalorian Seasons 1+2, Andor, and Rogue One has been absolutely stuffed with these absolutely idiotic choices that destroy any kind of world cohesion or just straight up suspension of disbelief.

Why should people care about Rey beating Palpatine if he can come back from being literally blown up in the death star? What prevents him from coming back again?

People are sick of Star Wars because the new writers, directors, and producers are shoveling out the lowest tier of absolute slop with no care at all.

So no, people don't hate Star Wars because of inclusivity, or sexism, or racism, that's limited to the the screeching Andrew Tate fans. People hate Star Wars because the troglodytes in charge of creating new Star Wars content have no respect for what they make or for the soruce material. To them, it's just more soulless content to pad out the DIsney+ roster.

Just look at the success of Fallout. Even though the same old anti-woke crowd was out in full force the show was still beloved and widely loved by both ciritcs and audiences. Can you guess why? Because it was a good show, period.

5 • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Chrismmm

@Mimbus: I don’t mean to brush it all aside, but vocal minority of the fandom has made this an undeniable staple point and it had affected all levels of the industry. Of course you have the right to dislike The Last Jedi, just like I have the right to tell you that The Star Wars Christmas Special was a crime against humanity. It would be just as disingenuous to ignore what stands before you.

And on a side note, I was not into Palpatine’s return, either, I have my issues too. Specifically with the Last Skywalker. They would have done better with a common director with a single vision. There is an enormous amount of criticism to be leveled at the pacing, the bloated character roster, some of the uninspired graphics and modeling. (The whoIe Chewbacca death-not death, *barf*). But I still love Star Wars just like I loved it through, and a lot of the unwarranted hostility towards Star Wars nowadays comes from a vocal minority on the internet that is fairly easy to identify given their penchant of all caps titles to their YouTube rants. I love talking what works and doesn't work with fans, but online I always worry what direction the conversation could go should its parameters fall apart, so I'm sorry if I offended you or if I come across as defensive or whatever.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Mimbus
Mimbus

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mimbus

@chrismmm: Internet trolls are internet trolls you only feed them by acknowledging them.

I will note, however, that the Christmas special was universally hated and had no white knights jumping in to defend what was objectively a travesty.

The vast majority of the new Star Wars content seems to exist in two parallel dimensions. According to critics Star Wars is going from strength to strength, from crushing victory to crushing victory. In the real world, we have a trilogy where two directors act like kids in a playground kicking over each other's sand castles. That is very due criticism. We both know that neither The Force Awakens nor The Last Jedi planned for Palpatine to be the big bad. We both know that when Kylo Ren said Rey's parents were nobody, that was actually canon, until JJ Abrams threw a fit and made her a Palpatine. Also, are you genuinely going to tell me that the same man that managed to turn Darth Vader back from the dark side is somehow going to pull out his lightsaber on his nephew because of a scary vision? The same man that dough Darth Vader to a standstill somehow lost to an untrained child and somehow lost the entire crop of the next generation of Jedi? The Last Jedi was like reading bad fan fiction.

The "undue criticism" is just a red herring that studios and critics use to distract from the serious narrative issues that modern Star Wars suffers from.

I was a die hard Star Wars fan for decades, and now I couldn't even care less about a new Star Wars TV show because I know that the magic is gone. That's the most disappointing thing. I wish I could still get excited. I wish I had something to look forward to. Do you think I enjoy looking back at what used to be such a big part of my life and only seeing disappointment? And you know the worst part? You and I both know that it's never gonna get better. Every new entry is worse than the last. At this point they're just propping up a dead horse by throwing good money after bad.

3 • 
Avatar image for Destructionzz
Destructionzz

822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

Just the other day I finally got around to watching Tales S2. I wasn't aware of this, great timing, thanks.

2 • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Chrismmm

@plustwenty:

RT basically takes verified critics and seperates them from the general public. It then takes an aggregate score based on the quality of the review (i.e. 3/5 stars gets a positive). People don’t like that they are not allowed to vote with verified critics, because the verified critics go through vetting and have jobs in the field and such. It is not a perfect system, but is one of the best out there.

So, on a verified 90% review you can bet that 90% of reviewers gave the film a 3.5/5 or higher.

And, for the record, RT casts a wide net when searching for certified critics-they dont just ask corporations what they thought of their own movies. Newspapers, magazines, blogs, etc. all contribute under the RT certified community, and the reason for the weighted average is to distinguish it from things like IMdB, which will give you a movie’s average score, but it won’t tell you how many professional critics rated the movies as ”worth a watch”. Such sites, as is the General Audience section of Rotten Tomatoes, are prone to manipulation via the flooding of good or bad reviews due to less security (so-called review bombing)

One more thing, by changing the threshold for “fresh to 3/5” also eliminates the inefficiency of cataloguing everyone’s individual point systems, which invariably change from person to person. ”One man’s three is another man’s five.” Therefore, rather than a cumulative score, you are left with a critical recommendation "90% critics recommended this film!" It didn't score a 90% on a test, it just reached a larger group of the audience. The flip side is possible too-sometimes great movies are shown to a less receptive audience. In these cases, the Audience Score can often act as a check and balance. But note, one may not alter the others positive response.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for G-Corleone
G-Corleone

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@chrismmm: never use RT bruh, i cant believe u think that website is valid

2 • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@G-Corleone: Then by what metric should I decide a movie is worth watching, your word? I understand the metric behind RT, I know its limitations, and I know its strengths. 92% of credited reviewers are rating the film a 3/5 or above, even if there is a little sketchy math in there somewhere, I'm going to be willing to be it is worth a little of my time. IMDB, Audience Scores, places viable for review bombing, I give little credence to. Put your name to your work and stand by it, its why, even when I disagree with Gamespot's review, I appreciate their well-stated opinions and shared experiences.

Now, please, this is the last time I'd like to address this. Stop "calling me out" for standing by Rotten Tomatoes, "bruh".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blindbsnake
blindbsnake

1752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Lee Jung-jae is great... 8/10 seems ok. I´am enjoying so far. Nothing superb, but enough to entertain with some really solid performances...

Only downside... too little Carrie Anne Moss...

2 • 
Avatar image for chrismmm
Chrismmm

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@blindbsnake: I agree, I was hoping for more Carrie Anne Moss

Upvote •