Review

Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 3 Review - One Last Emotional Ride

  • First Released May 5, 2023
    released
  • movie
Phil Owen on Google+

The film is immaculately constructed by writer/director James Gunn, but the story is missing something.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 from writer/director James Gunn, is very well-crafted, hilarious, and, yes, touching. I even teared up a couple times. But once the post-credits scene came to an end and the lights in the theater came up, I was already over it.

Out of context, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is a great movie that hits all the right notes and features all sorts of imaginative, stunning, and very colorful environments. Someday I might be able to enjoy it that way. But right now, what I see is the 32nd movie in a franchise that has had more than its fair share of bloodless climactic battles against armies of CGI beasts. There are several of those battles in this movie, including one that's among the best action sequences in Marvel history.

But what if pizza were the only food you could eat? You could have whatever kind of pizza you wanted, but it still had to be pizza. No ice cream. No omelettes. No tacos. Just pizza. That's what the Marvel Cinematic Universe feels like at this point--we've eaten so much pizza over the past 15 years that even a movie as high-quality as Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 can become just another pie that we have to choke down.

No Caption Provided

The film picks up with the Guardians on Knowhere sometime after the Guardians Holiday Special, with Peter Quill drinking himself into a stupor over Gamora's death and Rocket roaming aimlessly while listening to "Creep" by Radiohead on Quill's Zune. The camera swoops around the station in a gorgeous lengthy single take, checking in on each of the other Guardians as they go about their business. The whole thing is as dour as you might expect from a scene with "Creep" as the needle-drop, and it only gets more so once the action starts moments later.

That action comes courtesy of Adam Warlock, a super-powerful new Sovereign (those gold folks from Guardians 2), who is there to capture Rocket and bring him to the High Evolutionary--the epic Marvel villain who created Rocket. Warlock makes a big mess of the place, nearly killing Drax and starting some kind of self-destruct sequence on Rocket's cyborg upgrades that will take some time to kill him. But Nebula manages to injure Warlock and sends him running.

Rocket's on borrowed time, though, and so the Guardians decide to go after the High Evolutionary directly to find a way to save him. They get help from the new alt-Gamora, of course, who has become a Ravager since she was brought to this universe with alt-Thanos in Avengers: Endgame.

At the heart of the film is Rocket's backstory from his time under the High Evolutionary's "care," which we see play out in flashbacks while he's unconscious in the present. It's the best stuff in the film, no question--it's very emotional and messed up in all the ways it needs to be. And it's one of the rare parts of the Guardians films where it doesn't feel like Gunn's nihilistic outlook is buried a little bit by the PG-13 rating. (If you want to know what something much closer to unfiltered Gunn looks like, try the R-rated The Suicide Squad.)

But outside of these flashbacks, there's just something missing. Once again, we've got a new Marvel movie with no connective tissue to any story except the ones these characters were in previously. Once again, we've got a story with apparently universe-wide ramifications that provides no context.

No Caption Provided

And perhaps the most frustrating part of that is the lack of context for the villain, the High Evolutionary. In this movie, he's just an evil mad scientist with no nuance or any deeper levels, but in the comics he only became like this after he himself was subjected to the same torturous fast-evolution process that he was performing on animals.

That kind of complex character backstory--the bad guy who is also a victim but nonetheless has to be put down because there's no other way to handle it--is usually a James Gunn hallmark. But the High Evolutionary here has no backstory at all. Like Ant-Man & the Wasp: Quantumania did with Kang the Conqueror, this movie reduces another weird and conceptually interesting villain into just another raging baddie who spends most of the back half of the movie yelling about stuff.

And that's the rub with Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. It's an extremely polished and well-made movie that's as colorful and as much of a feast for the eyes as the previous two films, with some mind-blowingly awesome action sequences to boot, but it doesn't add up to anything more than that. After 15 years of this franchise, that's pretty frustrating. But it's so well put together, fortunately, that you should have a good time anyway.

Phil Owen on Google+
Back To Top

The Good

  • The action is some of the best in the MCU
  • Rocket Raccoon's backstory hits really hard
  • As beautiful and visually inventive as the previous Guardians films

The Bad

  • Doesn't feel like part of a shared universe
  • The villainous High Evolutionary lacks the nuance and care that Marvel usually gives its bad guys
  • It still feels like director James Gunn is too constrained by the PG-13 rating

About the Author

Phil Owen is a freelance writer. Disney provided a screening of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 for the purposes of this review.
35 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for RELeon
RELeon

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By RELeon

I know they have to hold back in order to keep a PG-13 rating, because kids do love these movies too, and they are just as much for kids and they are for adults. But could you imagine how much crazier and awesome these movies could have been if they were all rated R?

That would have shown just how brutal the MCU could be to everyone involved in the movies.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Vodoo
Vodoo

3881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

15 years it's been between the 3 movies?!! Damn.... They gotta speed these things up like they used to be. I thought it was bad waiting a year or two between the LoTR's and Matrix trilogies back in the day. 15 years for 3 movies is unacceptable. They should be faster now, not slower, with all the computing power of today.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santinegrete
santinegrete

7091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

@Vodoo: I dunno, if the time they take is for quality, I'm ok with waiting.

4 • 
Avatar image for HAWK9600
HAWK9600

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Vodoo: Nah, it's been about 9 years. First one came out in 2014

5 • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Good old Pete

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pillarrocks
pillarrocks

4149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

Edited By pillarrocks  Online

I didn't like Volume 2 thought The Guardians of The Galaxy is great.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

MCU sucks now.

4 • 
Avatar image for illegal_peanut
illegal_peanut

4210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@zaryia: You do realize you say this about every comic book movie they reviewed on this site. right?

2 • 
Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Zaryia

@illegal_peanut: Yeah but they've been pretty bad outside of a handful. Like TDK, Iron Man, TWS, Avengers 3, The Batman were good. But most suck.

2 • 
Avatar image for blindbsnake
blindbsnake

1752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@zaryia: Everyone has his own tastes. I prefer Cap Am:The winter soldier to those... except maybe TDK...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By mogan  Moderator

@illegal_peanut: Everybody's got a gimmick.

4 • 
Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

42366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@mogan said:

@illegal_peanut: Everybody's got a gimmick.

Its mine as well, so its fine.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for fbplayer1086
fbplayer1086

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Interesting. A lot of reviews are calling it one of the best marvel movies. The first GotG is probably only behind the spiderman movies for me so I'm very excited to see this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gleencross
GleenCross

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

It's a weird situation for me because Guardians had so many highs and lows... the first movie and the PS4 game are pretty good, the game is better than the movie actually (even if the gameplay was pretty bare bones). However, I tried the comics... they are not good, kinda all over the place, Star Lord has zero charisma (typical boyscout "leader", bland, like Cyclops in space).. and the second Guardians movie is really awful imo, cartoonish moments, repetition of themes. So even if I am still finishing the game right now, I am not excited for more Guardians content. And by the way, Rocket does expose his entire background in the game, it's sad and melodramatic, but I honestly didn't felt anything. If the movie will show up exactly the same story bits, I can see some people getting "emotional"... but CGi talking animals don't affect me anymore, which is sad, I got older and more cynical for this kind of stuff

Upvote • 
Avatar image for primemooseart
Primemooseart

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Mehh once again. I never ran to the theaters for a Gunn movie. Always waited to stream and was glad I never paid theater money.

3 • 
Avatar image for lodoss900
lodoss900

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@primemooseart: Nicccce! What are you going to do with all that money yous saved?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gargar
gargar

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@lodoss900: Haha

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dushness
Dushness

1355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

nuance and care given to bad guys? which bad guys?

2 • 
Avatar image for halfofme07
HalfOfMe07

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dushness: Right? WTF is he talking about??? 😂

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Wow. Well, given that the first two movies are easily my favorite Marvel movies, I'm gonna assume this review is way off base, at least as far as my tastes go. Still can't wait to see it.

4 • 
Avatar image for taylorspace
taylorspace

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By taylorspace

@mooglestar: I love the Guardians movies the most out of Marvel films too, so you are going to love this one, I promise!

4 • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@taylorspace: @thecupidstunts: @santinegrete:

I loved it! What a tear jerker. Gosh my eyes were watery multiple times lol. Also funny as always, with great action sequences. But yeah, a really fitting end to an incredible trilogy.

4 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@mooglestar: Nice! Very glad you enjoyed it! 😺

2 • 
Avatar image for taylorspace
taylorspace

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@mooglestar: So glad you liked it! Tear jerker for sure.

3 • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@taylorspace: Awesome! I see it on Sunday, since that's the only time I could get free from my home duties 😁

3 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@mooglestar: Hope you enjoy it Moogle! 😺

3 • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@thecupidstunts: Thanks!

2 • 
Avatar image for santinegrete
santinegrete

7091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

@mooglestar: please let me know after you watch it. No sarcasm.

4 • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@santinegrete: Sure thing 👍🏻

2 • 
Avatar image for illegal_peanut
illegal_peanut

4210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I Swear GS always has to be the dude with the lower/lowest review score for any and every movie. Even over more trusted review sites.

Also, "It still feels like director James Gunn is too constrained by the PG-13 rating."? I doubt the movie would be better with more blood, and F-Bombs.

Upvote •