Battlefield is more realistic and more tactical game than Call of Duty. In call of duty you don't need to be part of a team to do good (even though having a good team is always good) but in battlefield if your team sucks you are doomed!!! I'm gonna get both games and I know I'm gonna love Battlefield much more than Call of Duty, but Call of Duty is the best game to play when you don't have much time to think about strategy and all of those stuff.
Ok, I think none of above games can be considered really moralistic games, as you said here all of them was Black & White, the best one in those was fallout 3 though it didn't have that much effect on the game. But one of the most moralistic games that I found is TESIV:Oblivion, in that game usually you don't have to choose between two paths or sth like that, but you can do right, and wrong without having to decide in any certain part of the game. In most of the quests you should do sth, and usually you have only one way to do it, but before doing any quest you can choose which one you want to do. The other thing in that game is none quest morality, for example you can pick pocket people, or even break in their homes and sell their stuff, but in the other hand you could go do hard quests to gain a little more coins. In that game it is all about your career choices, you can do that, you can do the other one instead, or even you can do both things (that's the biggest problem of game but it is still possible).
I think it needs a super internetconnection for sending and recieving that much amount of data from a server Computer. And there is another problem, how much does subscription service cost for each month or year. I really don't like it when I must pay 100$ each 3 months plus prices of the games.
tntnavid's comments