Oh, hi there. It's been, what, almost six years? Yeah, hi... I work in the accounting field now, and while it's not the most thrilling type of work, I do appreciate the security it affords. Anyway, I brought myself out of isolation to comment on something I've read on various forums. Long story short: I reviewed Super Metroid for the Wii Virtual Console some years ago and supposedly gave it a score of 8.5, and people think I'm a raging boner for doing so. Well, guess what haters -- I didn't. For kicks, I checked the original Word document I submitted. The review I submitted for copy editing had a score of 9.0 in the "suggested overall score" box. Make of it what you will. I can say that, while not explicitly stated, GameSpot's editors at the time supported an informal policy that WiiVC releases had to be judged not for their significance, but for their overall place within the ENTIRE gestalt of the Virtual Console library. Or, to put it another way: we were supposed to ding them a little for being $5 to $10 money-grabs. Honestly, I think Super Metroid is a great game, and I think the review gets the point across. Moreover, this further points to why I say readers need to READ or LISTEN to the content of reviews and just ignore the score entirely. What does an 8.5 or a 9.0 mean anyway? Other than being better than a 5.0, a number doesn't tell you whether or not the game will be right for you. Good tidings, y'all.
Log in to comment