Honestly sometimes it's comical and embarrassing how littered with grammatical errors and typos gamespot articles are. Do you guys not proofread before you post?
A 5 minute video review is barely enough to scratch the surface on the info required to cover a full-price game like this. There is so much left uncovered in these bare-bones reviews from Gamespot.
A video review should give the reviewer a chance to connect with the audience on a personal level and delve into specifics of what makes the game great/poor. These rushed video reviews just come off like a robot reading a script. Please take inspiration from youtubers such as Angry Joe, who take sometimes 40+ mins to truely cover the game.
I've been playing the beta for a long time and this trailer is so misleading. This is nothing like the game. Don't get me wrong, the game is good, but it's basically a taking off and landing simulator, within almost identical environments. The joy comes from trading commodities between systems.
@mastertien123 @drysprocket yeah i agree with @mastertien123 , danny had just released several great videos of no man's sky. The fact that he got around to producing this at all is cool.
Weird, ,most of the other reviews on the net are surprisingly positive about this device. I wonder if Mark gave it a proper chance, or whether he'd already written the review in his head before he even opened the box (with his ipottie gags).
coldscooter's comments