@SpazldNinjaDude yeah, it's a dream of ours. But let be honest with ourselves, at least with DICE, the company is gone a long time ago. It's physicaly/literaly a EA's department named after a old company that made a game with some resemblance to EA's ones. (we could even call those games: inspired by X. X = some game that used to be created by)
@SpazldNinjaDude I'm beyond 100% on your first insight. True, the new is always plaged by vocal minorities (or majorities. rarely but it happens), doesn't matter how the new comes, it never makes up for every expectations people had. I don't agree your final statement. I've declined to buy old IP's new titles because it's "new things", and so other people too. Largely a Battlefield fan, here, and not buying the new BF4. In my case, is purely my on going boycott on EA (battlefield series was out of that....was...), plus my taste on fps and why I reached for battlefield back in the days is not really there anymore. I believe I'm not alone. Either way, not really interested as many old BF vets. The comunity was too tiny to compete in numbers against newcomers, simple as that, for the good of for the bad. Peace mate.
@Dredcrumb9 ......because it is a kids arcade game ?
but seriously, older battlefields gave more stuff for your brain to do without the need of gore. the franchise it's a friendly controled environment for kids, with little to dig into.
@HapiJoel You just picked one of the worst connections in Payday's references and waved it as a sign of poor creative execution, which payday does not suffer. You just "sounded younger".
Zooner1399's comments