Mass effect 3's ending was what sucked. The homosexual bit didn't bother me, the DLC didn't bother me, the fact that the ending resolved NOTHING and gave no closure to anyone or anything is why the game is getting b*tched at. It was a great game up until the last few minutes, then it sucked. Hard.

There is so much wrong with this, I'm going to counterpoint everything wrong. Self-Worth: He consistently comments on how he isn't a hero, and keeps to himself about his abilities. That he is capable is irrelevant. What matters is his perception of himself, which is not elevated. (0 points) Stimulation: Ambition is not the same as unable to deal with boredom. He managed to stake out for a whole day in a car waiting for someone on more than one occasion. Lets cut this one in half. (1) Cunning and Manip: Your description had nothing to do with this aspect. He was straight-forward, but not harsh. Read the facial expressions. What is he supposed to do? Not do his job because it might hurt the family's feelings? (0) Lack of Remorse: How do you figure his guilt throughout the whole game about his actions in Okinawa a lack of remorse? You are using PLAYER actions as deciding factors. So perhaps you are the psychopath. (0) Callousness: Have you ever seen a homicide detective get uptight over dealing with death or nasty situations? This post is awful. (0) Long-term goals: Upholding the law and cleaning up the streets as he says so many times in dialogues with his partners about doing good (and making up for his failures in the war?) Again, you're wrong. (0) Responsbility for actions: When? He blames himself through the whole game. His dialogue with Mr. Insurance and Life shows that. (0) Versatility: Again, more on you than on him. (0)

A rightfully critical article from a company seemingly unconcerned that they just lost over 50 million credit cards.

Price of a 360: 350 system + 50/year online + 20 bucks a pop wireless batteries + MANDATORY intercooler 25 + Wireless adapter 100 dollars. (add HD-DVD before it failed for 150 and this gets worse) = $545 Price of a PS3: 400 for system, build in wireless, free online, built in controller batteries, cooling system is fine, but 25 bucks for itnercooler anyway, built in blue ray = $425 360 is cheaper? Try again nnn

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=36251 I wonder why this video makes the two systems look EXACTLY THE SAME. Because the one we're commenting on is biased. Your move, Yassam

Lol.. Yassam, not once did I say anything about growing up. And yet, we see that my arguement holds true, while you continue to toss insults rather than come up with something credible. The point is that YOU talk about ebing an adult, but all you've done in EVERY response you've made is insult others, rather than make a valid point. You repeatedly just praise the 360, and do nothing to refute ANY of my arguements. Very good job btw. You ignored the points I made, and jumped into insulting me. What are you, a democrat?

Go look at the screenshots for any PS3 exclusive title. Notice the color isn't bleached out like it is in this "Comparison" thread. Oh, and I also notice that some of the images are not in HD for the PS3 screenshots on this website.

Also, notice that you can't see the detail on the face of the man on the 360 version, or whether some of the clothes are more than 1 piece on the 360 version. The PS3 version has clearer rendering of edges, which seems to go unmentioned, and rather than everything being dark and hard to see, the PS3's version has a clearer contrast (despite the efforts by gamespot when they lowered their contrast settings to make the image look grainy.) The color is bleached, which does not happen on either system when they are actually played. Settings have been altered, as I said before.

Yassam, you do realize that all of the "comparisons" you just mentioned are companies/sites that are SPONSORED by, or are affilliates with Microsoft. If you took a moment to take your mouth from Microsoft's sack, go look at Japanese comparisons... The PS3 always looks better. There is nothing but bias in these. Do the comparison yourself, there is VERY little difference in the systems.

I love these comparison threads. They always make me laugh. The setting on each system are never the same. Each party always wants to make their choice system look better. I have connected both games to identical TV's when I used to work at Best Buy via identical cables, ran them side by side. THEY LOOK IDENTICAL. The only thing I noticed was the 360 seemed to have clearer shadowing, while the PS3 had better rendering in the distance. This is ridiculous. Gamespot is NOTORIOUS for pushing the 360 no matter what. But nonetheless, the PS3 does NOT look grainy and grey like they show here. They have messed with the settings, because I can promise you that if you look at a PS3 connected to an HDTV anywhere, it won't look like that. EDIT: Now that I really look at them, the bleached color in the PS3's picture could be one of two things, the contrast is lowered on the picture they took, (do it on your monitor, look what it looks like.) or the PS3's is not in HD, I'm actually taking alook at mine, and noticing MASSIVE differences in the images compared to my HDTV and PS3. The 360 (yes, i own both) seems to be the optimal settings as well as being in HD.