IPs Microsoft missed out on owning.

  • 105 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

Remedy

Gears

Mass Effect copyright info

^Microsoft distributed Dance Central for MTV Games/Harmonix.

Microsoft also missed out on buying developers such as Bizarre Creations, Harmonix, and Bioware to add to their extremely lacking 1st party repertoire.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

James161324

None of those flopped, and Microsoft wasted $500 million in advertising for Kinect.

Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

James161324

Yep, I'm sure if they're dead last next gen they'll invest into some new studios.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

Nintendonly

None of those flopped, and Microsoft wasted $500 million in advertising for Kinect.

Still microsoft doesn't see the need to drop money into ip. Then agian at any chance studios will go multiplatform, more people equals more money.

Kinect has sold well so far.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
So...what's the point? I think it's better that these developers got to keep the rights to the games that they worked hard to create. That means if the publisher treats them like crap, they can walk away and take the property that they love with them somewhere else. How is this bad?
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#7 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
They're not in the business of exclusives anymore, so they don't need first party studios. They only care about hardware sales and Xbox Live.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#8 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
They don't care about that. It's about Kinect and hardware sales.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

Now here are some IPs Microsoft owns but fail to remember that they own them-

Retro Gamer

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
So...what's the point? I think it's better that these developers got to keep the rights to the games that they worked hard to create. That means if the publisher treats them like crap, they can walk away and take the property that they love with them somewhere else. How is this bad?jalexbrown
This! I was waiting for someone else to say that - but I agree completely. I'd much rather that (for example) Remedy own the rights to Alan Wake, and thus choose to keep it on the 360 because of their good relationship with MS, same with Epic. Understand that in many cases there may be contracts preventing that, but it's better than MS buying an IP and then locking a developer down to a specific platform when they could expand if they wished.
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Truth. It would leave the Nextbox in a better position. As it stands, what will they have for their next console, aside frommultiplats and a half arsed halo attempt?

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

James161324

They also supply their users free online versus play.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

James161324
Is that why they did it last gen too?
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

Nintendonly

They also supply their users free online versus play.

Once again great, but it awlays a step or two behind xbl.

Xboxs sell becuase of their online.

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
I would however like to see MS invest a bit more in new IP's.
Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

James161324
:? Why invest billions into the console market if you aren't doing it right? Exclusives sell consoles after all. Xbox 1 would have failed without Halo. MS' is cruising on 3rd party ATM. It isn't hurting them, but it won't kill the competition either. Arguably, MS could have knocked Sony out after 2007 if they played their cards right.
Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

FIipMode

Is that why they did it last gen too?

Microsoft barely had any new IPs last gen, either. Phantom Dust is something they should go back to.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#19 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50374 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

Nintendonly

None of those flopped, and Microsoft wasted $500 million in advertising for Kinect.

They didn't waste their $500 million... they probably earned that back in less than a month since Kinect is pure profit for Microsoft. I mean, 2.5 million Kinects were sold in 10 days -- that's nearly 400 million in revenue right there. And since they make nearly $100 profit per Kinect, they probably well passed that investment.
Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#20 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts
I thought they owned the Alan Wake IP
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

The games are still linked to the xbox brand and most probabley won't appear on anyother platform ..... ME2 was a pure karma.

But who cares? most these games suck ..... imo.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

RavenLoud

:? Why invest billions into the console market if you aren't doing it right? Exclusives sell consoles after all. Xbox 1 would have failed without Halo. MS' is cruising on 3rd party ATM. It isn't hurting them, but it won't kill the competition either. Arguably, MS could have knocked Sony out after 2007 if they played their cards right.

Its micrsoft why did they relase vista, or why did they close down one of the best pc studios. No one knows.

They knew how to get it out first and thats what has helped their sales, along with some great advertising. I think it shows you don't need an amazing exclusive lineup to do well. Plus price point is big one

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

Xboxs sell becuase of their online.

James161324

Way to be wrong. Go work in retail- you'll come to find out that people buy the Xbox 360 because it is initially "cheaper" to them. People are easily swayed into buying a PS3 once you explain everything to them, especially once you mention that PSN is free instead of an arbitrary $60 a year.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="James161324"]

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

Nintendonly

Is that why they did it last gen too?

Microsoft barely had any new IPs last gen, either. Phantom Dust is something they should go back to.

No I was talking about Sony.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

Xboxs sell becuase of their online.

Nintendonly

Way to be wrong. Go work in retail- you'll come to find out that people buy the Xbox 360 because it is initially "cheaper" to them. People are easily swayed into buying a PS3 once you explain everything to them, especially once you mention that PSN is free instead of an arbitrary $60 a year.

that to, but it does sell becuase of the online to certian gamers. If people were so easierly swayed ps3 would be outselling the 360

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Mass effect is great.

Gears gets worse each iteration

Alan Wake bored me to tears.

Dance Central ... Looks excellent to be honest.

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

If people were so easierly swayed ps3 would be outselling the 360James161324

Another issue with retail- nobody has the guts to explain things in great detail.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]If people were so easierly swayed ps3 would be outselling the 360Nintendonly

Another issue with retail- nobody has the guts to explain things in great detail.

True, but it doesn't matter to them if they sell 1k ps3 or 360. But if sony advertised better i think it would have done better. Micrsoft advertises to the stupid consumer

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#30 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"]I thought they owned the Alan Wake IPNintendonly

Well, you thought wrong and like all fanboys, lack the capability to do your own research.

But who cares? most these games suck ..... imo.omho88

They suck to you now since you found out that their future of exclusivity is questionable.

Did you just call me a fanboy lol? how was I thought they owned Alan Wake IP a fanboy comment? lol I am actually insulted
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"]I thought they owned the Alan Wake IPNintendonly

Well, you thought wrong and like all fanboys, lack the capability to do your own research.

But who cares? most these games suck ..... imo.omho88

They suck to you now since you found out that their future of exclusivity is questionable.

Nah, I always hated G and ME, AW looks cool tho. And since I am a cow mostly, I should be liking them since they could make an appearence on the PS3 as well.
Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

Nintendonly

None of those flopped, and Microsoft wasted $500 million in advertising for Kinect.

If you judge by Kinect sales, I don't think the money was wasted.
Avatar image for xXCombatWombat
xXCombatWombat

1529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 xXCombatWombat
Member since 2009 • 1529 Posts

Cows love to throw around that 500 million number like MS is strapped for cash now...They are making major profits from Kinect, even with the 500 million ad budget

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

short of alan wake Microsoft wouldn't have been able to buy those IPs why is it you think they could have just plopped down cash and said its ours now...the owner has to okay the purchase.

gears is owned by epic but Microsoft published the first 3 games so bar a name change it wont appear on ps3.
bioware at the time mass effect was made was being in the first stages courted by EA so...

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

Research and development costs are imaginary. They don't exist.

Avatar image for Funconsole
Funconsole

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Funconsole
Member since 2009 • 3223 Posts
Why are you creating threads about ip's that MS own and don't? Are you trying to tell us something?
Avatar image for dachase
dachase

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 dachase
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

FIipMode

Is that why they did it last gen too?

and the gen before that. Lemmings seem to forget that Sony has delivered a much better gaming experience than Microsoft. Bet 90% of the 360 fanboys owned a PS1 and PS2.

360 might be just slightly ahead of Sony this gen but the Xbox brand is no where near the level of the Playstation brand.

Avatar image for dachase
dachase

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 dachase
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts

short of alan wake Microsoft wouldn't have been able to buy those IPs why is it you think they could have just plopped down cash and said its ours now...the owner has to okay the purchase.

gears is owned by epic but Microsoft published the first 3 games so bar a name change it wont appear on ps3.
bioware at the time mass effect was made was being in the first stages courted by EA so...

WilliamRLBaker

With $500 mill being blown on advertising, im not so sure its a case of the owner having to okay the purchase, more a reflection of M$'s priorities in the business and thats advertising >>>>>>>> Live Fees>>>>>>> casual shovelware to sell to the unsuspecting masses >>>>>>>> funding and developing original ips

Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

Blasto

MediEvil

Good times.

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#40 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts

Blasto

MediEvil

Good times.

Nintendonly

Relevancy your honor

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
Like I said in the other thread: it doesn't matter. If they go multiplat they go multiplat until then it doesn't matter in the slightest.
Avatar image for Nintendonly
Nintendonly

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Nintendonly
Member since 2009 • 1409 Posts

Whoopsie, I forgot this bad boy-

Tomba!

Relevancy your honorDiviniuz

It is quite relevant, my dear fanboy. Sony and Nintendo continued to pump out massive exclusives all of the time.

And they still do.

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#43 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts

Whoopsie, I forgot this bad boy-

Tomba!

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"] Relevancy your honorNintendonly

It is quite relevant, my dear fanboy. Sony and Nintendo continued to pump out massive exclusives all of the time.

And they still do.

I can't tell if your serious or not... Anyways I need to finish up my applications, you win, I quit

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
MS has proved this gen there more interested in lining there pockets than giving great game experiences to there loyal consumers. This is a perfect example of why i love Sony, they spend there money on 60 million dollars budget exclusives in the interest of the gamer. They also buy studios and get rid of them.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]So...what's the point? I think it's better that these developers got to keep the rights to the games that they worked hard to create. That means if the publisher treats them like crap, they can walk away and take the property that they love with them somewhere else. How is this bad?Ravensmash
This! I was waiting for someone else to say that - but I agree completely. I'd much rather that (for example) Remedy own the rights to Alan Wake, and thus choose to keep it on the 360 because of their good relationship with MS, same with Epic. Understand that in many cases there may be contracts preventing that, but it's better than MS buying an IP and then locking a developer down to a specific platform when they could expand if they wished.

I feel that Microsoft handling things the way they have been encourages them to focus on actually having good relationships with the developers. I'm not saying Sony treats their developers like crap, but if they did then what could they do about it?
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#46 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts
[QUOTE="James161324"]

[QUOTE="Nintendonly"]

[QUOTE="James161324"]

Sony has to put the money into ip as they don't have really anything to fall back on. They have blueray, guess what i can get one for 80 bucks now.

They also supply their users free online versus play.

Once again great, but it awlays a step or two behind xbl.

Xboxs sell becuase of their online.

ya like they are getting ne wear with that ,, wii seams to have sealed the victory door shut long time ago , and it doesnt even have much online , and is less powerful, that said , its pretty sad ms came out front trying to pull a ps2 instead they slide back ! and continue the slide back
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#47 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
they need to kick rare's ass so i dust off my 360 and hopefully play a new jet force gemini and/or another perfect dark game. seriously, fellas. seriously.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

When it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter, micrsoft is selling consoles so why invest 100 million into a game or studio that may flop.

Nintendonly

None of those flopped, and Microsoft wasted $500 million in advertising for Kinect.

they didn't really "waste" 500 mill seeing as how they're getting all back

Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

they don't own alan wake?

if so, that one i think is most likely to come out on ps3.

it'll be like NG2 and Mass Effect all over again.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

they need to kick rare's ass so i dust off my 360 and hopefully play a new jet force gemini and/or another perfect dark game. seriously, fellas. seriously.yellosnolvr
I agree if Microsoft had Rare making the games I want them to make I would purchase another 360 to play the new games.