Is my system under-performing?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

I've been having trouble with some games getting fairly low fps recently, and I'm just wondering whether I should be getting more or whether it's normal.

My system:

AMD Phenom II x4 955

2GB DDR3

HD 5750 1GB (I know this isn't the best card, but it was cheap, so I picked one up.)

Win7 Ultimate 32 bit. (Gonna get 64 bit when I get some more ram)

600W Generic PSU

In Fallout 3, I'm running on standard high settings with 8x AF at 1440x900, and my fps only manages to stick at about 50-60. In some indoor areas, mainly the Rivet city market area, my fps drops to about 30, which I don't think should be happening, considering not a lot goes on in there.

I can't run GTA IV with anything over 25 on any settings, but that's not a big deal.

CoD4, W@W and MW2 all lag horribly whenever there's smoke or a few explosions.

Killing Floor won't run properly without projectors turned off. If it's on, light sources and looking at monsters seems to lag me badly.

All of these are without AA at the same res. I've tried new drivers, cleaning the old ones, and nothing seems to have changed. Is it just the card? I think I may have over-estimated how good it was.

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

I'm not completely sure how good a 5750 is, but it looks like something is off if you ask me. My best guess is your PSU is crappy and causes your machine to perform poorly.

GTA IV isn't something you should benchmark by though. The game is completely random as far as performance is concerned. Unless you're running an i7 though, you wont average past 40 FPS with medium settings. Personally i run 30-40 FPS in that game with a Q6600 @ 3.4 GHz, and a 5870 (GPU load normally around 20%-40%). This is with mostly high settings, since i barely get an FPS boost from turning the settings down.

The most important setting to adjust in that game is the shadow quality one. Shadows are calculated in real time by the CPU, which is heavy work. If you got the shadow quality up too high you're going to suffer.

Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

Well, I've been trying to get this fixed for a few weeks now. Shadows seem to make no difference in Fallout. In the market area, I'm still just getting over 60 with everything turned to the lowest possible setting. Starting to irritate me really.

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

Well, I've been trying to get this fixed for a few weeks now. Shadows seem to make no difference in Fallout. In the market area, I'm still just getting over 60 with everything turned to the lowest possible setting. Starting to irritate me really.

Kenwyne
Fallout just stops dead after a certain point though, so I wouldn't worry about that. Try checking your CPU usage and GPU usage while gaming, that could at least let you know what's causing the trouble. The easiest way of doing so is to have the stuff running on a second monitor, but if you don't have one, you'll just have to use programs that make graphs.
Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#5 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

I've been having trouble with some games getting fairly low fps recently, and I'm just wondering whether I should be getting more or whether it's normal.

My system:

AMD Phenom II x4 955

2GB DDR3

HD 5750 1GB (I know this isn't the best card, but it was cheap, so I picked one up.)

Win7 Ultimate 32 bit. (Gonna get 64 bit when I get some more ram)

600W Generic PSU

In Fallout 3, I'm running on standard high settings with 8x AF at 1440x900, and my fps only manages to stick at about 50-60. In some indoor areas, mainly the Rivet city market area, my fps drops to about 30, which I don't think should be happening, considering not a lot goes on in there.

I can't run GTA IV with anything over 25 on any settings, but that's not a big deal.

CoD4, W@W and MW2 all lag horribly whenever there's smoke or a few explosions.

Killing Floor won't run properly without projectors turned off. If it's on, light sources and looking at monsters seems to lag me badly.

All of these are without AA at the same res. I've tried new drivers, cleaning the old ones, and nothing seems to have changed. Is it just the card? I think I may have over-estimated how good it was.

Kenwyne
COD4 and COD MW2 should run flawless, Fallout 3 also, GTA 4 may stress your CPU harder than the GPU. The HD5750 isn't a beast but thoose games should run just fine but 8AA on ewrythig is perhaps a little to demanding. I play most games high settings with 4AA (Using a card witch performs like your's it's the HD4850 ), and the diffrence in visual isn't big vs. 8AA but the framerate don't take as much toll, if you don't manage to pull high settings in thoose games with AA you have some performance issue.
Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

What resolution are you running? I looked at some benchmarks comparing it to my old card (8800 GTX) and i noticed it really took a dive in one of the 1920 x 1200 benchmarks.

EDIT: 5750 on the left, 8800 GTX on the right

What's a bit weird is the 5750 was doing much better in most of the other benchmarks, so it must be a soft spot for that card.

Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

I'm playing at 1440x900. Could you recommend some program I can use to check temps and usage too?

Avatar image for BDK-Soft
BDK-Soft

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BDK-Soft
Member since 2009 • 795 Posts

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/ for temp monitoring and gpu usage.

Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

How would I go about making a log in game then.

Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts

I've been having trouble with some games getting fairly low fps recently, and I'm just wondering whether I should be getting more or whether it's normal.

My system:

AMD Phenom II x4 955

2GB DDR3

HD 5750 1GB (I know this isn't the best card, but it was cheap, so I picked one up.)

Win7 Ultimate 32 bit. (Gonna get 64 bit when I get some more ram)

600W Generic PSU

In Fallout 3, I'm running on standard high settings with 8x AF at 1440x900, and my fps only manages to stick at about 50-60. In some indoor areas, mainly the Rivet city market area, my fps drops to about 30, which I don't think should be happening, considering not a lot goes on in there.

I can't run GTA IV with anything over 25 on any settings, but that's not a big deal.

CoD4, W@W and MW2 all lag horribly whenever there's smoke or a few explosions.

Killing Floor won't run properly without projectors turned off. If it's on, light sources and looking at monsters seems to lag me badly.

All of these are without AA at the same res. I've tried new drivers, cleaning the old ones, and nothing seems to have changed. Is it just the card? I think I may have over-estimated how good it was.

Kenwyne
GTA 4 is explainable, if you want to max out games that are more CPU dependent with amazing framerates (arma II, BFBC2, etc) then the I7 is the only way to go. Otherwise, it is because your video card is like that of an 250gts, so don't expect to OBLITERATE games.
Avatar image for BDK-Soft
BDK-Soft

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 BDK-Soft
Member since 2009 • 795 Posts

How would I go about making a log in game then.

Kenwyne

Sensors tab, tick 'log to file' and 'continue refreshing'.

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

How would I go about making a log in game then.

Kenwyne

GPU-z makes a graph, so if you just alt+tab you should be able to see how you were just doing. I believe there is also a checkbox for logging to a file though, but i haven't used that feature myself before.

EDIT: Ninja'd

Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

Standing still in the market area on F3, the load was about 60-70 percent and the temps were about 55C. FPS was about 40.

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

Standing still in the market area on F3, the load was about 60-70 percent and the temps were about 55C. FPS was about 40.

Kenwyne
Then it's a CPU issue, since the load is not maxed out on the GPU.
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

Just checked cpu usage in the same area, and it's at 45%.

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

Just checked cpu usage in the same area, and it's at 45%.

Kenwyne
As long as it's maxed out on one core, that's your problem. Few games will be able to utilize all 4 cores to the max.
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

Surely it should still run reasonably well though. The game DOES say it utilises multi-core as well.

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

Surely it should still run reasonably well though. The game DOES say it utilises multi-core as well.

Kenwyne
It's close to 50%, which sounds about right. Most multi-core games utilize mainly 2 cores AFAIK.
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

It seems to be using all 4 cores, yet still runs like ass. Pic

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

It seems to be using all 4 cores, yet still runs like ass. Pic

Kenwyne
Have you tried turning down the texture detail? I have a feeling your card may be overloaded on the memory front. Sure, it has 1GB of VRAM, but the bus width isn't enough to use all of it effectively. You could get that card as a 512 MB model and not loose any performance on it. If that's the case, It would make sense that the 8800 GTX beats it on that one benchmark, since it has a higher bus width (although it's got slightly less memory).
Avatar image for theragu40
theragu40

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 theragu40
Member since 2005 • 3332 Posts
[QUOTE="Kenwyne"]

Standing still in the market area on F3, the load was about 60-70 percent and the temps were about 55C. FPS was about 40.

matte3560
Then it's a CPU issue, since the load is not maxed out on the GPU.

I have a slightly OCed PII 920, and I have none of the problems he is having. He might have a faulty CPU I suppose, but it is not an issue with its capabilities.
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

As I said, even on the lowest settings/lowest res, I'm only just getting over 60. That's a bit odd. Also, the fact that I get nowhere near other benchmark scores.

Avatar image for matte3560
matte3560

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 matte3560
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

As I said, even on the lowest settings/lowest res, I'm only just getting over 60. That's a bit odd. Also, the fact that I get nowhere near other benchmark scores.

Kenwyne
Well, I suggest you try a better quality PSU if you have access to one. If that's not the problem, I really have no idea what it might be. Have you tried different drivers? The 10.6 drivers have caused a lot of problems for people, myself included. I'm running 10.4 as of now, and i haven't had a problem with them yet. Another thing you should check is that your graphics card is running the correct clocks during gaming. You can do this with GPU-z, in the same way you'd check the load.
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

I checked the clock speeds a while back. They change from 2d to 3d fine when I open a game. I'll have to try a new psu sometime then.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#26 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

As I said, even on the lowest settings/lowest res, I'm only just getting over 60. That's a bit odd. Also, the fact that I get nowhere near other benchmark scores.

Kenwyne
have you turned of Vsync? If the FPS is cap'ed at 60Hz you will never go any higher than that.
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

Tried a new PSU. No change. Also, vsync isn't on.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#28 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

Tried a new PSU. No change. Also, vsync isn't on.

Kenwyne
You can have the option in the NV controlpanel or in the games setting, some games have the setting ON by default. Can you run a 3Dmark or such app to determin that your PC don't unterperform against simularsettups? You sure you fitted the GPU in the rigth PCI-e slot? (so it's running a full PCI-e X16? and not like x4? ) I don't think you have a trouble with the PSU cause it would crash and perhaps Bsod not underperform. (well in the most cases things should get wierd not just underperform.)
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

All the readings on the card are fine. It's running at the correct clocks and it's at pci-e x16 2.0. I'll try 3dmark now.

Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts

There is nothing to fix, you are getting the performance you are supposed to be getting.

Edit: Hell, to put it in perspective, with my 5870 OC'd and what not I can't get over 15-20 fps maxed out in gta 4 with my native res because of my qx6700 @ 3.75ghz. On my old 8800gts 512 Modern warfare 2 lagged with explosions and smoke effects and what not like you (graphics cards are very similiar in performance). So, yes, nothing is out of the ordinary.

Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

I disagree. You think Killing Floor of all games should be laggy on my system? I've been looking on Google and I've only found a handful of people who have problems with it. Even older, crappy systems can max it with no trouble. CoD definitely shouldn't be laggy either.

Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts

I disagree. You think Killing Floor of all games should be laggy on my system? I've been looking on Google and I've only found a handful of people who have problems with it. Even older, crappy systems can max it with no trouble. CoD definitely shouldn't be laggy either.

Kenwyne
Actually, the CoD thing I explained. As my rig WAS extremely similar to yours and I can identify with all your issues. Killing floor I have no experience with, so I cannot comment. But, otherwise, I'm telling you; you are getting exactly what you should be getting.
Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#33 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts
[QUOTE="Kenwyne"]

I disagree. You think Killing Floor of all games should be laggy on my system? I've been looking on Google and I've only found a handful of people who have problems with it. Even older, crappy systems can max it with no trouble. CoD definitely shouldn't be laggy either.

Bigsteve3570
Actually, the CoD thing I explained. As my rig WAS extremely similar to yours and I can identify with all your issues. Killing floor I have no experience with, so I cannot comment. But, otherwise, I'm telling you; you are getting exactly what you should be getting.

What's up with CoD? none of them should cause an issue particular at that resolution. My PC is about the same performance as TC's and i had no trouble with thoose games running higher resolution and with AA i havn't checked FPS in all of them but they were all smooth. The only game (of thoose) where the game seems to chunk sometimes is GTA IV but that game... not sure what cause the microstutter because the FPS meashured was fairly high even in the choppy sections i guess that particular game just runs very badly.(as have been discussed many occations.) Killing floor, i don't even know what that supose to be but if it's a game i havn't played that one. :P
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

I'm not that arsed about GTA, 'cause I know it's a pain to run, but in CoD, simple things like a grenade explosion or flames cause my fps to drop down into the 30's or 40's, which I don't think's right. I'm over the recommended requirements.

Avatar image for caseystryker
caseystryker

5421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#35 caseystryker
Member since 2005 • 5421 Posts

Sounds about right performance wise. I'm not sure what you expect. The suggested recommended requirements for most games are generally pretty low. I always use those as minimum requirements.

Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts

I'm not that arsed about GTA, 'cause I know it's a pain to run, but in CoD, simple things like a grenade explosion or flames cause my fps to drop down into the 30's or 40's, which I don't think's right. I'm over the recommended requirements.

Kenwyne
If you really think something is wrong with those numbers, then you are in for an upgrade on that rig then.
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

Righty 'o. I guess I really did overestimate it then. I still can't get over the Killing Floor thing though. It should be running flawlessly.

Anyway, I was actually thinking of getting a new graphics card. Is the HD5850 any good?

Avatar image for i-like-pie
i-like-pie

4070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 i-like-pie
Member since 2005 • 4070 Posts
Maybe the PSU cant give the juice to the GPU?
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

I'm not that arsed about GTA, 'cause I know it's a pain to run, but in CoD, simple things like a grenade explosion or flames cause my fps to drop down into the 30's or 40's, which I don't think's right. I'm over the recommended requirements.

Kenwyne

It's not right. IIrc the HD 5750 and HD 4770 are similar. I max out CoD:MW2 @ 1600x900 with 4x AA and have no framerate issues what so ever. My CPU is also considerably slower.

Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts

Righty 'o. I guess I really did overestimate it then. I still can't get over the Killing Floor thing though. It should be running flawlessly.

Anyway, I was actually thinking of getting a new graphics card. Is the HD5850 any good?

Kenwyne
Yes, it quite an amazing overclocker. Try to get a reference model which has voltage control and a higher quality PCB. No, it is not a PSU problem (I confirmed this when my 4870x2/5870 wasn't getting enough juice). It was actually a CPU bottleneck.
Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts

[QUOTE="Kenwyne"]

I'm not that arsed about GTA, 'cause I know it's a pain to run, but in CoD, simple things like a grenade explosion or flames cause my fps to drop down into the 30's or 40's, which I don't think's right. I'm over the recommended requirements.

Tezcatlipoca666

It's not right. IIrc the HD 5750 and HD 4770 are similar. I max out CoD:MW2 @ 1600x900 with 4x AA and have no framerate issues what so ever. My CPU is also considerably slower.

People have different perspective on framerate "issues". You probably are fine with 20-30 fps, he isn't. I am the sameway. I am EXTREMELY sensitive to framerate drops (which is why I ordered an I7 platform + cpu).
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="Tezcatlipoca666"]

[QUOTE="Kenwyne"]

I'm not that arsed about GTA, 'cause I know it's a pain to run, but in CoD, simple things like a grenade explosion or flames cause my fps to drop down into the 30's or 40's, which I don't think's right. I'm over the recommended requirements.

Bigsteve3570

It's not right. IIrc the HD 5750 and HD 4770 are similar. I max out CoD:MW2 @ 1600x900 with 4x AA and have no framerate issues what so ever. My CPU is also considerably slower.

People have different perspective on framerate "issues". You probably are fine with 20-30 fps, he isn't. I am the sameway. I am EXTREMELY sensitive to framerate drops (which is why I ordered an I7 platform + cpu).

60 fps (vsync on) And that is without the clocks I have in my sig. I returned the clocks to 830/850 because I haven't been gaming much.

Proof:

Avatar image for Bigsteve3570
Bigsteve3570

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Bigsteve3570
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts
I have no doubt he gets 60 frames+ at segments during the games, but he is obviously describing during specific situations that his frames drop to 30-40.
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

I have no doubt he gets 60 frames+ at segments during the games, but he is obviously describing during specific situations that his frames drop to 30-40.Bigsteve3570

Exactly. He shouldn't be dropping to sub 40fps with his PC at 1440x900 and no AA. That's not normal.

Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

Back to square one then.

Avatar image for Chris_53
Chris_53

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#46 Chris_53
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
I remember Fallout 3 would allways have V-Sync on, even if you turn it off in the game. Try forcing it off in the control panel, that may well increase your performance
Avatar image for Kenwyne
Kenwyne

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Kenwyne
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

I forced it off anyway, with the ipresetinterval thingy in the ini file.

Avatar image for HeduttajaFIN
HeduttajaFIN

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 HeduttajaFIN
Member since 2008 • 30 Posts

I would recommend checking your ram usage since 2GB of ram is not that much these days. I currently have 4GB (but since I'm using a 32bit OS it can only utilize 3.2GB) and my usage in idle is about 30% and during heavy gaming (like crysis) it can get up to 75%

Avatar image for 29121994
29121994

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#49 29121994
Member since 2008 • 1166 Posts

Well, I've been trying to get this fixed for a few weeks now. Shadows seem to make no difference in Fallout. In the market area, I'm still just getting over 60 with everything turned to the lowest possible setting. Starting to irritate me really.

Kenwyne

Fallout has really random performance and as far as i can tell. You seem to be perorming a little bit less than what i'd expect. A friend of mine has the same cpu as you with a 5770 and 4gb of ram and he can't run the game on absolute full detail because it lags. So he's turned the resolution and settings down on fallout 3 to get it going normally. Another thing, gta iv is really difficult to run well so don't use that as a basis. The other thing that might be slowing your computer down is the amount of ram. Considering that gta iv uses around 1.6 gb on my computer (i have 6gb) it would be using less on yours so as to allow for other programs. I'd say a ram upgrade wouldn't be too bad an idea. Oh and before i forget, a 5850 would be an EXCELLENT upgrade, i'm one step above with a 5870 and i absolutely love it :D. I hope this helps