At what month should non-mandatory abortions be stopped?

So for the pro-choice people out there, do any of you still think there's a limit at which non-mandatory abortions (abortions that arent required to save the mother's life) should be stopped? 

Part of me feels that abortions become more reprehensible the closer you get to birth, after 5 months or so

I'd say after the first 3 months.

I mean if it takes longer than a couple months to decide whether or not to have an abortion, you have issues. 

I mean if it takes longer than a couple months to decide whether or not to have an abortion, you have issues. 

BossPerson

I mean if it takes longer than a couple months to decide whether or not to have an abortion, you have issues. 

BossPerson

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

I mean if it takes longer than a couple months to decide whether or not to have an abortion, you have issues. 

ghoklebutter

Pregnancy is INCREDIBLY easy to avoid.Nuck81

Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.JML897

Pregnancy is INCREDIBLY easy to avoid.Nuck81

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.Zeviander

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.Zeviander

Can't say I agree with this. In the third trimester the only reason abortion should be legal is if the woman's health is at riskJML897

Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

So at 9 months?

Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

[QUOTE="JML897"]Can't say I agree with this. In the third trimester the only reason abortion should be legal is if the woman's health is at riskZeviander

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.Zeviander

What does that have to do with this thread? The TC said outside of mandatory abortions.Pirate700

what about 2 hours before projected birth?

should you be able to abort while experiencing the first signs of labour kick in? 

You can put it up for adoption if you don't want it.Pirate700

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]What does that have to do with this thread? The TC said outside of mandatory abortions.Zeviander

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.BossPerson

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]You can put it up for adoption if you don't want it.Zeviander

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

That's irrelevant. They aren't dead and have a life.Pirate700

(once you ban one type, it only takes clever legislation and an appeal to emotion and you'll be able to ban them all). Zeviander

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]That's irrelevant. They aren't dead and have a life.Zeviander

Source

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Pregnancy is INCREDIBLY easy to avoid.DrTrafalgarLaw

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.lostrib

So at 9 months?

[QUOTE="Zeviander"](once you ban one type, it only takes clever legislation and an appeal to emotion and you'll be able to ban them all). ghoklebutter

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]lol, 2 days before projected birth? you make liberals look badDrTrafalgarLaw

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

So at 9 months?

At 9 months it can probably live on its own, couldnt it just be removed from its mother (alive) and given up as a ward of the state

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Abortions should be allowed at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.ghoklebutter

So at 9 months?

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

So at 9 months?

lostrib

At 9 months it can probably live on its own, couldnt it just be removed from its mother (alive) and given up as a ward of the state

Sourcelostrib

you need to lay back a little when it comes to ideologies. the autonomy of the mother is irrelevant if were talking about a "thing" that looks the exact same inside or out of the mother (minus the cord) BossPerson

That's a hasty assumption to make; my position is based on a view of bodily rights, not just ideology.

I simply don't agree that the fetus ever has a right to be in the mother's body against her will.

i'm of the general belief that once the baby has the capacity to live outside of the womb on its own, then that's when abortions should not be allowed. Rich3232

[QUOTE="Rich3232"]i'm of the general belief that once the baby has the capacity to live outside of the womb on its own, then that's when abortions should not be allowed. BossPerson

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]you need to lay back a little when it comes to ideologies. the autonomy of the mother is irrelevant if were talking about a "thing" that looks the exact same inside or out of the mother (minus the cord) ghoklebutter

That's a hasty assumption to make; my position is based on a view of bodily rights, not just ideology.

I simply don't agree that the fetus ever has a right to be in the mother's body against her will.

Something tells me if I said this same thing about Guns, you'd say I was nuts. I don't think setting some line or limits is a bad thing...for almost anything.Pirate700

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]you need to lay back a little when it comes to ideologies. the autonomy of the mother is irrelevant if were talking about a "thing" that looks the exact same inside or out of the mother (minus the cord) BossPerson

That's a hasty assumption to make; my position is based on a view of bodily rights, not just ideology.

I simply don't agree that the fetus ever has a right to be in the mother's body against her will.