GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Ubisoft's Mysterious 1666 Might Be Moving Forward Again

French publisher downplays the filing, saying it's "standard business practice."

12 Comments

[UPDATE] A Ubisoft representative told GameSpot, "It is a standard business practice to renew trademarks in order to protect them. We don't have any additional comments to share."

The original story is below.

Ubisoft has filed a new trademark application for 1666, potentially signalling the Assassin's Creed and Far Cry publisher is gearing up to make some kind of announcement. DualShockers discovered the application, which was filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Wednesday, April 13.

No Caption Provided

The application covers "game software and electronic game programs." Another line from the description explains that it covers "computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles."

Ubisoft's specific intentions for this new trademark filing are unclear. Trademark filings do not always lead to announcements, but the timing is intriguing, considering E3 is only eight weeks away and how Ubisoft has teased a new AAA game coming relatively soon.

Little is known about 1666, which was first revealed through a 2012 trademark application and also mentioned in THQ bankruptcy documents. Ubisoft scooped up the 1666 rights at THQ's bankruptcy auction, paying $2.5 million for not only 1666, but also the THQ Montreal studio and a new game codenamed Underdog.

1666 was conceived by Assassin's Creed creator Patrice Desilets. In 2010, Desilets left Ubisoft to establish THQ Montreal and became a Ubisoft employee again when the company bought the studio. His new path at Ubisoft didn't last very long. In May 2013, just months into his new role, Desilets claimed he was fired by Ubisoft, and went on to sue the company, attempting to reclaim the rights to 1666 in the process.

Ubisoft suspended work on 1666 amid the lawsuit. It is believed that Ubisoft still owns the IP, which is seemingly backed up by the recent trademark filing.

According to Desilets, who has since announced his own new studio and game, 1666 was to be "the new Assassin's Creed." We have contacted Ubisoft in an attempt to get more details on this trademark filing.

Ubisoft's E3 2016 briefing is slated for June 13 at 1 PM PST.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 12 comments about this story
12 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for rafael_costa
Rafael_Costa

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

That's not fair,Patrice Desilets should lead the development of the game,after all he is the creator of the game!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shay-cormac
Shay-Cormac

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Assassin's Creed 3 was supposed to take place in Amsterdam in 1666. But probably just a coincedence.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DutchZombie
DutchZombie

2659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Seems like a French thing to do, buy an ex employee's studio so you can fire him all over again and steal his stuff.

2 • 
Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

Assassins Creed 1666

Far Cry 1666

Hawks 1666 lol

3 • 
Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

Tom Clancy's 1666

3 • 
Avatar image for -sharp-shooter-
-sharp-shooter-

2677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

And it will suck, like EVERY other Ubitrash game. Yes....I wasted money on The Division. Such a bland/boring crapfest.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rosinmonkekyx17
rosinmonkekyx17

3019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@-sharp-shooter-: Speak for yourself

Also, I did not find GRAW, GRAW 2, TC Endwar, Ghost Recon Future Soldier, Rainbow Six Siege, Assassin Creed 1, 2...to suck or to be "trash"

2 • 
Avatar image for darthrevenx
DarthRevenX

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

Watch it be the next big thing......in other words another derivative kinda stealth but not really action adventure kinda game where you climb ridiculous towers, assault guard posts, and do pointless busy work to unlock abilities in a open ended world that limits where you can go by saying this northern area.....that's off limits until a specific time, we'll phone you when it's open to you and even then you'll have to fight for it......type game......

I'l pass......Ubisoft is if anything predictable in a bad way....

2 • 
Avatar image for TheAlmightyCow
TheAlmightyCow

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is not "Ubisofts game". They literally stole it from Patrice.

3 • 
Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

@TheAlmightyCow: Ubisoft was like "Patrice you left us now we are gonna leave you the street kid!"

2 • 
Avatar image for xADx
xADx

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@TheAlmightyCow: They paid $2.5 million for the IP. Can not steal something that doesn't belong to him in the first place.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Redrivar
Redrivar

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redrivar

@xADx: Everybody got their pants puled down when THQ went under. Employees didn't even know the publisher was closing down, they just stopped getting paid.

Upvote •