Twitch Sues Two Alleged Hate Raiders

@Swampthing: I always tell people to understand the Difference remember OJ Simpson.. He was Acquitted of criminal murder charges but lost everythig when founf guilty in the civil lawsuit by the Goldman family.. H elost his Heisman,,What few assets he had left after his lawyer dream team. WHich was also the most expensive legal team assembled at the time..

**As far as Twitch goes= this is a desperate publicity stunt to scare people into stop bothering streamers they find offensive..

And everyone finds different types offensive.. I find Madden Ultimjate Team card pack openers offensive cause they aren't using their own RL money for the cards and even if they are it's promoting a garbage mechanic tht ruined Madden & all EA sports games bakc in 2013 or 2014 when it started...

Funny how they call it 'Hate Speech" when it's nothing mor ethen not aggreing or someone talking smack.. Nobody over 30 believes this nonsense. And those that do are pretending for probably weird personal or political reasons. Just like anyone believing we accidentally left 100 million in military gear behind for Goat Farmers to inherit.. Today someone agrees with the reason to lose free speech cause maybe they agree witht he reasons but these companies could care less if a streamer has hurt feelings or is stream sniped. My god the arrogance that a streamer will live stream and complain if someone uses it against em..

Solution= dont live stream or dont complain.

I like the option where they go away forever.

TLDR~ The sickening OJ legal team knew he was guilty and didn't care & falsly painted everyone else as evil..

F.Lee Baily,,Johnny Cochran, and of course the biggest slimebag of em all Kardashian! Ironic and disgusting the way the OJ docuseries painted Kardashian as only learning at the end that OJ was guilty and stoppe dbeing friends with him..I remember my sister and her husband making everyone watch it to see what a fake fraud he was and how his powerful family changed the truth that they ALL knew he was guilty and represented him anyways and actually won..

@sbargovox3: Gee whiz, guys! How do you have time to play video games when you're so busy being heroes!

@sbargovox3: So then how is it now, only when Twitch's problems with "hate raids" have hit some of the more mainstream distributors of news on these subjects, that Twitch publicly and vociferously has "people who support the oppressed, abused, or othered without it directly benefitting them?"

From what little I've seen Twitch's responses to date have apparently been more along the lines of Apathy's demotivational poster, "If we don't respond maybe they'll stop calling" than they have been along the lines of a reasonable, responsible, ethical, and moral response to the situation.

I could easily be mistaken, but in the current world environment it is not only much harder to naturally believe that companies have our best interests at heart, it's also significantly harder to prove that they actually do have our best interests at heart than it is to prove that they're ambivalent at best and maliciously predatory at worst.

@Darkflare_EX: Not much of a message, though. You can't really sue a non-existent entity based on a screen name, and I imagine you can't really demand a person's private info unless it's a criminal matter, and you certainly can't do that outside your jurisdiction.

They're basically saying "We're going to sue you...you...whoever you are! So, uh, don't come back!". They're about as threatening as an old man waving his cane at a bunch of fleeing teens who egged his house.