GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

The Division Will Have A Second Year Of DLC, But No Word On A Sequel

Q&A: We speak with game director Julian Gerighty about The Division's first year and what's coming up next.

8 Comments

[UPDATE] During a Twitch livestream today, Ubisoft said it's celebrating The Division's birthday by giving everyone who logs in over the next week a free emote, as well as 200 premium credits. Additionally, there will be some in-game events to mark the anniversary.

No Caption Provided

Also during the livestream, creative director Julian Gerighty confirmed The Division will not have a Season Pass for its Year 2 DLC; everything will be free.

There are three elements to the first expansion (which doesn't have a name or release date), including limited-time events that will pay out rewards for participation, completition, and competition. There will be leaderboards for these.

The second part of the expansion are loadouts, while the third is an in-game achievements rewards system that is, at least right now, called "Feats." Players can earn rewards, described as "marks of distinction," for short-, medium-, and long-term activities. Players will be able to earn another vanity slot.

This first expansion of Year 2 is expected to launch this summer, possibly in July or August.

Gerighty also said during the livestream that the second content pack for The Division for Years 2 will focus on providing more story and narrative to the game. This pack will have "more narrative weight," Gerighty explained.

Finally, Gerighty again stressed that a level cap increase and more paid expansions are off the table for The Division Year 2.

Outside of the new content packs, Ubisoft will continue to adjust The Division's gameplay and balance as needed, the developer said.

The original story is below.

Ubisoft's post-apocalyptic shooter The Division launched one year ago today. It was an up and down year for the game, as the launch was strong, but players dropped out due to lingering issues and a lack of reasons to keep playing.

In response to this, Ubisoft delayed some of The Division's paid expansion packs, saying it wanted to address the problems before asking people to pay for more content.

No Caption Provided

It seems Ubisoft's efforts paid off, as The Division saw a massive spike in daily active users (up 150 percent) for the company's latest quarter. Now, with The Division's final expansion, Last Stand, released in February, Ubisoft is looking to the future and a second year's worth of content.

Creative director Julian Gerighty tells GameSpot that Ubisoft is planning two "major" free content updates for Year Two. New features are coming as well in the form of the "most-awaited loadouts, more achievements to collect, and The Division's take on a "seasons" format.

"We want to give our players new ways to challenge themselves, play in different ways, and give them means to compete with others in various activities," Gerighty teased.

That's all we know for now, but Ubisoft promises to share more details on what's next for The Division soon.

GameSpot's full interview with Gerighty covers a number of subjects, including how The Division is a "comeback" story, learnings from Year 1, why criticism is important, what his hopes are for Year 2, the possibility of a Nintendo Switch version, and a lot more. You can read the full thing below.

GameSpot: The Division is one year old today. The ups and downs of that year have been well-documented. In one word, how would you describe the first year?

Gerighty: I would love to have more than one word to describe the amazing journey of working on a project such as The Division, but for the purpose of this exercise I would say that it is the story of a comeback.

In as many words as you want, how would you evaluate the game's first year?

We started with a very successful launch, as bestselling new IP and we have proposed a very compelling universe. When we entered our post launch we realized that our community was not satisfied with the experience in the end game. We made the very difficult decision to put our post launch plans on hold to take the time to listen and work on their feedback, in order to provide them with the experience they wanted for the end game of The Division.

"When we entered our post launch we realized that our community was not satisfied with the experience in the end game." -- Gerighty

Looking at the feedback from the community on 1.4, Survival and now Last Stand, we are very happy to have changed the way we work on our DLCs. Focusing on iteration and quality, with more testing time and also with the PTS, that we started to run with 1.4 and really helped us raise the bar in term of quality. Being part of such a big project with a very passionate community is a great opportunity, it’s both really exciting and humbling. We have all learned so much in this first year that we can’t wait to see what we will be able to achieve in the future.

What are some specific pieces of feedback about Year 1 that you want to address going forward with Year 2?

The content we designed in Year One brought us the foundations to build on in Year Two, and the learnings we had with our 1.4 update will certainly stick with us moving forward. We want to give our players new ways to challenge themselves, play in different ways, and give them means to compete with others in various activities.

For as much criticism as The Division received, there is no question it was a huge hit commercially. It seems like it will be Ubisoft's next big franchise. There can sometimes be a disconnect between what you read online and what you know to be true about your game. How do you manage that disconnect?

I wouldn't identify criticism and commercial success as a disconnect. The Division has a fantastic, very engaged community, who has been following us for years, supporting us in every step of the way and waiting for the release of the game. Such a big project generates high expectations as well.

Criticism is very healthy for a live game in particular and is a sign that our game has found a truly passionate audience, who really care about how the game is evolving and what choices the developers are making for the future of their cherished hobby.

You released some of the biggest and boldest patches in recent memory for any game, and you delayed DLC in some cases to make the game better. That doesn't always happen in games, since it also means delaying revenue. Can you talk more about why was it important for you to get the game's issues ironed out first before releasing the Survival and Last Stand DLCs?

We listened to our community feedback and realized that the core mechanics of the end game were not working as intended, and were very frustrating. Each of our DLC added new features, game modes and gear that changed the balance and economy of the game and it was time to pull the break, look back at where we were at, and improve on the core of the game and its overall quality, in order to open the way for even more new activities, with Survival and Last Stand.

It was a difficult decision to make as we were all pretty excited at the idea of working on Survival back then. This decision wasn't driven by revenue, we are gamers ourselves and we want to be proud of our work. We all agreed that it was better for the game, the community and even our own satisfaction as developers to delay the next updates to focus on the current state of the game. At the end of the day, we all love great games.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Looking ahead to Year 2, what are you hoping to achieve this year and what can fans look forward to in terms of new content or features?

Year One brought the foundations to a very strong end game, our intention with Year Two is to build up on what we do best to deliver experiences that our players enjoy and will be able to play and replay with their friends or in solo. In Year Two we are planning two major free content updates, more content for everyone. For now I can give you a quick peak on features like the most awaited loadouts, achievements and on our own take on seasons. We will reveal more content and features as we progress further in the development of our next updates.

Is there an update on player figures you can share that speak to how popular The Division remains today?

Since launch, players have spent over 100,000 years on The Division! There is an extremely high engagement on The Division. The average player plays several hours a day on the game. We are proud to be a part of their everyday life and this is also why we want to continue to provide them with fun and rewarding experiences.

The fact that there is a Year 2 for The Division instead of a full sequel might surprise some fans. When you created the massive world for The Division, I have to imagine a sequel was also planned. Is that something that could still happen?

All we can say is that we have a full team dedicated team to The Division and we are going to be busy for a long time.

One of the most exciting new platforms this year in the Nintendo Switch. Is there any hope that The Division could come to Nintendo Switch? Why or why not?

At this moment in time, no decision has been made in regards to bringing The Division to other platforms.

Sort of a housekeeping question, but with Massive's newly announced Avatar game, how is that impacting ongoing development of The Division or other projects that might have been in the works?

Avatar is a new project with its own dedicated team, and Massive is currently recruiting top talents to work on it. Avatar's development has no impact on the team working on The Division or on our plans to continually support and update the game and brand for the long term. We’re proud of what the team has accomplished with The Division, thankful for our community’s dedication, and looking forward to sharing more about what’s coming next for the game very soon.

The Division and Avatar are obviously incredibly different properties, but I would imagine there could be some crossover potential in terms of learnings that developers from one project can share with those on the other. Is that the case?

Absolutely. And that is the great thing about working at a place like Ubisoft. Sharing our development experiences within the studio and across different studios is one of our strengths.

A movie based on The Division is in the works and it has some serious talent attached to it with Jake Gyllenhaal, Jessica Chastain, and now writer-director Stephen Gaghan. How closely are you working with the movie team? And what kind of upside do you think there could be for how this film could grow the series?

Ubisoft’s internal studio--Ubisoft Motion Pictures--is working to develop the film and have put together a great team. They are collaborating with us to make sure that everyone involved in the project has a full understanding of The Division's DNA and what helped make its lore such a success. And we will continue to work with them as a resource throughout all phases of production.

We’re excited that the film will be able to introduce a new audience to the world of The Division as well as tell a brand new story meant to be experienced on the big screen.

Anything else people should know about The Division and Ubisoft's commitment to it this year and beyond?

The Division joined the group of Ubisoft's and of the industry’s biggest new IP, and we are working on the exciting plans for the future of the brand.

<><><>

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 8 comments about this story
8 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for iohannfus2015
iohannfus2015

388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

maybe i will start again to play it on ps4, i didn't touch the game since Survival was released, my friends starts again to play it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EricDWright
EricDWright

332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

No thanks

Upvote • 
Avatar image for suicidesn0wman
suicidesn0wman

7490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

If there's no additional campaign content I won't be interested. Dark Zone was fun for a few weeks, then the OP users wouldn't let the rest of us advance much past lvl 60 and all my friends stopped playing because of it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for spartanx169x
spartanx169x

2905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

@suicidesn0wman: If you had to put a $ value on the game , how much would it be? I have zero interest in the PvP content.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cappy
Cappy

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@spartanx169x: I would easily pay $40 for the base game and $20 for survival. I bought the full package and have been very happy with it. I dont like PVP much, but got into the dark zone a bit. I do enjoy with a friend / cp-op best and find it relatively easy to partner with good players, but survival is a blast solo. Much easier to enjoy with randoms than Wildlands, except for the hardest Division stuff.

Got so many hours of enjoyment from this game and still go back.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for suicidesn0wman
suicidesn0wman

7490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Edited By suicidesn0wman

@spartanx169x: That would depend on whether you have a friend to play the game with or not. It's best experienced as a co-op shooter. If you got a friend who'll play it with you I'd say it's easily worth $20. I don't think there is much point to any of the DLC but if you were in need of more co-op content I'd say Survival would extend the life of the game for you.

Not sure if I would recommend the game if you intend on playing solo.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Magnumpci
Magnumpci

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@suicidesn0wman:

'That would depend on whether you have a friend to play the game with or not.'

Its a sound point - you have about 30 minutes to make a friend that you would play with again. Were there guilds / clans, you have time to form relationships. Guilds / Clans also make players more sticky - why ther are not in the game amazes me still.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for suicidesn0wman
suicidesn0wman

7490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

@Magnumpci: Not sure what you mean by '30 minutes to make a friend.'

I played this game(and Wildlands) with a friend I've known for over 10 years now. We've played so many shooters together that we instinctively know which enemy the other is going to attack without the need to communicate that. Happened in The Division the first day we played the game and again recently during the Wildlands Open Beta.

That's what I meant by the game being perfect if you have a friend to play it with. I don't think the experience would be half as good with some random you just friended in 30 minutes over the weekend.

Upvote •