PC Specs For Remedy's Control Are Actually Lower Than Epic Originally Advertised

@WESTBLADE:

No they are not missleading (you must know which to watch) they simply show what GPU is capable off using 100% of its power. Then if you are happy with performance you must choose proper cpu for this gpu, proper means no cpu bound before reaching 100% gpu usage AND in case you dont want top tier gpu you dont need 9900k to reach 100% gpu usage (again, ofc if you dont want 2080ti). I know how to read various cpu benchmarks and based on few test on different cpu's with exact same gpu i can match proper cpu with that gpu so you can reach 100% gpu and have room for future gpu upgrade (cpu at around 70% at max) or games where cpu can be utilized more than in others.

All in all you can have same similiar gpu performance as in test made on 9900k using other cpu which is waaaay cheaper but dont limit the GPU (for 750ti the i7 2600 non-k at stock speed is more than enough, but when paired with lets say 2500k then they are most of the time at 100% usage, so no room for gpu upgrade), so this is balanced build as you mentioned, but, again, as long as there is no cpu bound before 100% gpu then you have similiar performance as in test on 9900k. If i want for someone new cpu instead of old i7 2600 then i know which benchmars score to compare and in that case i3-9100 will have similiar usage, DONE.

I dont care if your strandard is 4k and you need dept (as you write) for PC parts to play games on that quality but i understand that if you are at any standard it is hard to lower it so you must struggle (yes having dept to keep up with own standard IS struggle) but saying untrue (720p 20fps low) and mocking is silly and not true.

Also, thinking i'm poor based on my rant about RTX cards? You serious? Your logic is generic but what to expect from person who fall into NVIDIA trap which sell RTX as revolutionary thing while AMD already mimic this in Cry Engine (using regular AMD card whitout tensolike-bullcrap) and Ray Tracing will be present in future console operated by the AMD chips (that company you call crap). After falling into a trap you run to take a dept for RTX GPU confirming NVIDIA that he do right thing raising prices because of new feature (pumped by them to the sky) in computer graphic (there was always something, better shadows, antialiasing, tesselation etc. but they decide to pump Ray Tracing waay more than previous features). GG, your choice, be ready for next gen of GPUs with even higher price (after adding that which is caused by inflation ofc. which is normal and acceptable but NVIDIA wants even more).

Second also, you mocking that guy? I mocking ppls like you who think other than 4k ultra 60 fps is no pleasure and saying this is not even possible on gpu that guy have you responded to. 720p at 20fps as you suggest is bad and yes i aggre this is hardly enjoyable if even but you are wrong and dont know what you are talking about (in case of this gpu performance), on this exact card IS possible, many are happy with 720p 60 fps (heck even 40-50fps) with lowered settings to mid-low (depends on game) in today games.

Guy:

"Heck, I'm surprised at how many new games my 750 ti can run."

You:

"Maybe ''run'', but playing modern games at low settings, 720p and 20 fps must be real joy..."

Me:

Triggered

Get it??

P.S

Got GTX 970 in the past now RX 5700XT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_l9FjSLf6sg

As you can see performance similiar to RTX2080 while waay cheaper, **** Ray Tracing.