GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Avengers: Endgame Re-Release Makes $5.5 Million, As Toy Story 4 Stays No. 1 At US Box Office

The numbers are in.

11 Comments

The latest box office report is in, and the re-release of Avengers: Endgame has not proven to be a huge box office draw. Instead, Disney's Toy Story 4 was again the best-performing movie of the weekend in the United States and Canada. It made $57.9 million over the Friday-Sunday period, falling 52 percent from its opening-weekend haul of $118 million last weekend.

Toy Story 4 has now made $236.9 million in the US/Canada so far. Globally, Toy Story 4 has now made $496.5 million. All of the box office numbers come from Entertainment Weekly.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Avengers: Endgame Ending Explained! (SPOILERS)

In other news, Annabelle Comes Home landed at No. 2 with $20.4 million. It's the worst-performing Conjuring universe movie to date, and that includes the earlier Annabelle movies that opened in the US and Canada to $37.1 million and $35 million respectively.

Perhaps the most notable premiere of the week was the re-release of Avengers: Endgame, given the unusual nature of a re-release with a small amount of new footage coming so soon after the original theatrical debut. It made $5.5 million, and combined with more money from overseas, its total box office stands at $2.76 billion. It's about $27 million behind Avatar ($2.78 billion) for the all-time record, and box office insiders believe Endgame may never beat Avatar, at least not right away. The re-release hit theaters just ahead of Spider-Man: Far From Home, which debuts this week and is a fairly direct follow-up to Endgame.

Danny Boyle's Yesterday, which is a movie about a world where The Beatles do not exist, made $17 million for its opening weekend. John Wick 3 stayed in the charts, too, landing at No. 10 with $3.2 million.

June 28-30 US/Canada Box Office

All numbers from Entertainment Weekly

  1. Toy Story 4 -- $57.9 million
  2. Annabelle Comes Home -- $20.4 million
  3. Yesterday -- $17 million
  4. Aladdin -- $9.3 million
  5. Secret Life of Pets 2 -- $7.1 million
  6. Men In Black: International -- $6.6 million
  7. Avengers: Endgame -- $5.5 million
  8. Child's Play -- $4.3 million
  9. Rocketman -- $3.9 million
  10. John Wick: Chapter 3: Parabellum -- $3.2 million

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 11 comments about this story
11 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for stunningham
Stunningham

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Stunningham

I'd say it was mostly due to lack of theaters that held it. I have many friends that wanted to go see it but there wasn't anything nearby that was showing it, closest being an hour and a half away.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Elranzer
Elranzer

1422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Good.

Let Disney overtake Avatar with an original IP that's not based on any existing property. If they can.

2 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Elranzer: Disney now owns avatar soooooo they win no matter what.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Avatar remains king of the all time box office.

And rightfully so.

3 • 
Avatar image for nefastuss
Nefastuss

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Bread_or_Decide: Why? Its a rather bad movie. It had a somewhat nice 3d effect but it was nowhere close to being a good movie. Its only at first place because of how long it stayed on the movies (with no competition mind you) and due to being relaunched 3 times.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@nefastuss: It's a fantastic movie. Amazing visuals, a simple story that doesn't overshadow all of the weird alien world or creatures. The genius of avatar is to have a complex alien world, with a simple story anyone can understand. The action scenes are still some of the best ever put on film. It's an epic story with a great theme about the environment and a great performance from zoe saldana and sigourney weaver.

It's great scifi and it did what many films today cannot, win people over despite having some major weird alien stuff in it.

People like to poke fun at the Pocahontas in space structure, but that's the genius of avatar.

Ask Jupiter Ascending how its original story worked out for it...or Valerian city of a thousand planets. How did those weird complex stories work out, eh? Not so good.

But I don't expect geeks to understand. You'll watch 22 copy paste MCU films and then complain about 6 Pocahontas style stories that come out once every twenty years.

2 • 
Avatar image for nefastuss
Nefastuss

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Nefastuss

@Bread_or_Decide: I dont think its necessary to be offensive. You might like it but overall people deslike the movie. To me was bland to say the least. Yes, had nice effects but the story was weak and cringeworthy. What got people to watch it was the absurdly huge marketing campaign like nothing before and the supposed 3D effects that were long gone until then. Thats what got people in there. Not the poor story with lame stereotype characters.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Elranzer
Elranzer

1422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Elranzer

@nefastuss: Because Avatar was not based on any existing IP or property, nor was it based on a historical event (like the previous king, Titanic). It was a completely new and original movie, and the marketing convinced enough people to go see it despite not having any recognizable superheroes.

Avatar also made people interested in 3D again, during a time when faux 3D was saturating theaters and just causing ticket prices to rise for no gain (still does to this day).

Where as Endgame is merely the disappointing follow-up to Infinity War.

Avatar was an achievement. Endgame was not.

3 • 
Avatar image for nefastuss
Nefastuss

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Elranzer: Agree with Avatar marketing campaign, I dont think there ever was something like that.

About Endgame I dont agree at all. It made in days what Avatar took months to achieve. Plus Avatar was re released 3 times and when it originally was at the movies it had no competition for months.

Endgame was the conclusion of years of buildup. Maybe its not a big deal to you but surely was to pretty much everyone. As a fan of comics I really liked the movie (even if I didnt like several marvel movies such as avengers 1 and black panther).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Elranzer: Avatar changed film as we knew it for the next ten years. The MCU just had copy cats trying to create their own cinematic universes and failing. Avatar pioneered motion capture technology and 3D film making.

And you can bet Avatar 2 will do more of the same. That first trailer is going to blow minds.

2 • 
Avatar image for nefastuss
Nefastuss

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Nefastuss

@Bread_or_Decide: Avatar 3D effects didnt impress me. If anything it became a huge problem for movie watchers the same way lootboxes became after they were introduced the first time. Created a trend where everyone and their mother would release movies in 3D format to charge more for tickets.

Now I truly think its impossible Avatar 2 will get anywhere close to the sucess of the first. Too much time has passed for people to care about the story (that was already far from great), see Sin City 2 dissapointing sales. Unless the movie has virtual glasses and crap like that it will probably bury Cameron career. It was the new groundbreaking 3D effects that brought people to see the first movie, plain and simple.

Upvote •